I don't advocate execution either. They should have their power base dismantled, and be moved into council accommodation with standard pension and welfare benefits until they find a way to get back on their feet again, like selling their sob stories to 'Hello' magazine.
2007-10-01 13:37:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Citizen Justin 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
It´s a difficult question. I personally think with the passing of the present Queen, the Royal family will definitely decline, and become similar to other Royal households in Europe, by that i mean you may see the odd word about them in the press, but the paps don't follow them around like they do the Windsors, they are just not seen as that interesting!!
Everything has a life span, I think the royal household as we know it, is reaching it´s end, and I for one will not mourn there passing!! They have gained great status and wealth, from us the people, yes at some personal cost, but I believe they give us nothing of themselves in return, and never have!!
2007-10-01 11:51:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by speedboat 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
The final solution for Royalty is usually a glass of something alcoholic before they go to bed.
2007-10-02 07:01:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
there have been many many theories to whom jack replaced into and those have lined a member of the royal kinfolk on the time and he replaced into Prince Albert Victor Christian Edward for the period of the time of the Ripper murders, there have been no easily theories offered linking Eddy to the crimes. those might come lots later after many of the important characters interior the theories have been lifeless. So in answer on your question in all probability no longer
2016-10-10 03:14:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as the royal family are willing to carry on, then good look to them.
The monarchy is better than having a much more expensive presidency. Presidents only care about their paymasters. The royal family wants the job for generations, so is far more considerate of the publics wishes than grasping egomaniac politicians.
2007-10-01 11:56:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by bouncer bobtail 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
It is a very interesting question in deed ! For as long as people accept their presence, which I suppose is the case in England and elsewhere in Europe they should still be around...As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't bother me...If you believe this world should turn for the better without them, then I think you're being wrong...
2007-10-02 00:58:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by javornik1270 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Take away their governmental and judical powers and whatever church titles they've been granted or usurped over the centuries, and leave them in place as figureheads. Not everyone is a republican in the royalty banning sense. It worked just fine for England and Japan, but State Shinto, the cult of the god emperor, is still lurking in the background in the latter....
2007-10-01 11:47:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by sheik_sebir 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Royalty may not be involved in the leading of the country but they are a figurehead for England and our history and previous values.
Just because we no longer value anything, does not mean that i think that we should get rid of the only link our modern society has to the time where we had pride in our country and respect for authority.
2007-10-01 11:42:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
This question is very tendentious. It was not the Bolsheviks. Google "Final Solution". We are fine as we are.
2007-10-02 01:16:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by galyamike 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
My 'solution' support/finance for ......
King or Queen.
Next in line when king/queen dies.
The vaste army of 'next-in-line' should get jobs and should not get any state funding. UK disabled persons are expected to work - so should the royal hangers-on!
There are too many in 'royalty'. We should not be supporting their lifestyle.
2007-10-01 11:54:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by john 4
·
1⤊
1⤋