I ask this becuase nearly every policy or vote by the left on most issues seem to go against any logical progression in government, social or individual issues
2007-10-01 10:38:26 · 17 answers · asked by Eric R 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Like… Bigger govt. Yeah, yeah, President Bush increased govt. too, just not as much as the left usually does.
Hillary's Healthcare bill is a glaring example of taking a step back on improving something.
2007-10-01 10:55:20 · update #1
I agree, the term "Conservative" doesn’t truly agree with the Right either. We should call ourselves Progressives because we are the only ones who make sense and try to improve the ways this country works.
2007-10-01 11:00:51 · update #2
Isn't it pathetic that the only "ideas" Liberals come up with require spending more of OUR money? Every program is based on the premise that we American citizens are too lazy or stupid to run our own lives.
Even if any of that could be excused, Liberals have no cohesive philosophy. They simply jump from one "feel good" idea to the next, regardless whether it actually is beneficial, feasible, or even desirable.
How do Liberals go about solving a problem? Scream, panic, run in circles.... but use logic? Never!
2007-10-01 11:43:40 · answer #1 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
easily you will possibly no longer upload for liberalism does not help communism or FASCISM, such as you do!! right that's my definition of a liberal that suits me basically large: "Liberalism is an ideology, philosophy, and political custom that holds liberty as a results of fact the ordinary political fee.[a million] ordinarily, liberalism seeks a society characterised by using freedom of theory for human beings, obstacles on potential, particularly of government and faith, the guideline of regulation, the unfastened exchange of suggestions, a marketplace financial equipment that helps particularly unfastened inner maximum organization, and a sparkling equipment of government wherein the rights of minorities are assured. In modern society, liberals favour a liberal democracy with open and honest elections, the place all voters have equivalent rights by using regulation and an equivalent probability to be triumphant" Are you against any of that?
2016-10-10 03:10:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Exactly, LIberals have been unable to progress past the 60's..
2007-10-01 12:09:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-10-01 10:44:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't think you know what the words you're using mean. You misused logical, and regressive. regressive could be considered for the republican party that wants America to go back to some idyllic version of 1950s America that only exists in their minds.
2007-10-01 10:43:06 · answer #5 · answered by crushinator01 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Given that liberals haven't had any fresh ideas since the '60s, regressive would be a very appropriate term.
2007-10-01 10:46:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Just like shouldn't pro-choice be referred to as pro-death?
2007-10-01 12:21:14 · answer #7 · answered by Adelaide B 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You sir are absolutely correct. It is already well established that “progressive” = Marxist (all of their social/economic “ideas” are identical)
2007-10-01 10:57:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think liberal's progressively lead us into regression.
2007-10-01 10:44:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yeap, good old Darwin was right.....
....the Libs are living proof! maybe a missing link?
2007-10-01 11:35:58 · answer #10 · answered by Rada S 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋