English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/09/30/group-behind-smear-campaigns-against-limbaugh-o-reilly

he needs to listen to his whole show and stop taking him out of context.

2007-10-01 09:55:10 · 15 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2 in Politics & Government Politics

What Anti American crap tell me the only Anti American I hear are from the Far left

I bet he is smarter than you. You claim he is stupid but in reality if you meet him face to face he is smarter than you.

2007-10-01 10:18:55 · update #1

stop drinking kool aid there and I have to go with Rush on this the only person who need to say there sorry are the far left democrats

2007-10-01 10:20:42 · update #2

15 answers

What in the world is an educated person like Reid doing listening to some air-bag like Limbaugh, I thought he was cut and dried for the "somewhat" weaker mind....

2007-10-01 10:00:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Not only Harry Reid - but every far left op-blog and web site on the Internet.
As a side note, there was a host of questions on this forum after this story broke by left wing loons who were totally ga-ga over the chance to bash Limbaugh.
Turns out they were basing their questions on a deceptive lie - once again, the left opens their pie hole before doing any real research - to hell with valid and verifiable facts - just run with it. This seems to happen quite often when any story fits their agenda, doesn't it?

2007-10-01 10:13:32 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0 1

The article you left the link to was BS. He claims Rush and O'Reilly were simply taken out of context and yet spends the entire article merely trying to lay a foundation of connection to the Clintons. He never does state or even attempt to verify where any misquotes took place. Perhaps because none did take place.

2007-10-01 10:22:06 · answer #3 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 2 1

If Rush didn't call the veterans who disagreed with him on the Iraq war "Phony Soldiers", there'd be no controversy whatsoever.

I'd like to point out that not only is your article from Newsbusters, a very biased right-wing news outlet, the article fails to mention how Rush was supposedly misquoted.

2007-10-01 10:56:10 · answer #4 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 0 1

You really want to take the word of a site that boasts about its right wing polical agenda.

Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly say enough dispicable, anti-American crap that there is no need for anyone to take anything out of context. But if someone did, it would take more than the unverified word of some right wing smear site to convince me of that.

2007-10-01 10:03:29 · answer #5 · answered by buffytou 6 · 0 2

As your question pertains to immediately - He grew to become into taken out of context . He stated the interest Retard yet he grew to become into quoting Emmanuel Rohm. i do no longer think of he ever made the quote appropriate to the bone. Bloods and Crips grew to become into no longer a racial assertion - I t grew to become into to the reality that such countless NFL gamers ( black or white ) have been commiting criminal acts and being arrested ( on the time this grew to become into authentic ). So definite he grew to become into taken out of context on that. That being stated - He has additionally made some comments that i'm specific he needs he could desire to take decrease back.

2016-11-06 23:32:32 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

That's weak. You don't have to listen to an entire 3 hour program in order to determine the meaning of a couple of sentences. Rush called members of the military who don't agree with him phony soldiers. There's no getting around it and what he said an hour before or an hour later is irrelevant.

2007-10-01 10:08:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Quit yer whining. You guys never stop bashing a Clinton but whine like you just got ***** slapped when someone points out the hypocrisy of Limbaugh or O'Reilly.

2007-10-01 10:02:24 · answer #8 · answered by kenny J 6 · 1 2

More than 500 words from that article, and not a single evidence of the words that was taken out of context.

Enough with the liberal bashing, What did he say ?

2007-10-01 10:01:04 · answer #9 · answered by BrushPicks 5 · 2 2

newsbusters, another biased source. And Limbaugh makes a living out of controversy.

2007-10-01 09:58:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers