2007-10-01 08:52:27 · 20 answers · asked by Zay Bones 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Unless you have some compelling evidence that no one else seems to have, no...............
2007-10-01 08:55:49 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Harry Reid said publicly that the United States has lost the war in Iraq - at a time when we are still at war and our soldiers are on the front lines and in harms way - should Harry Reid be tried for treason?
Recently, a proposal was being drafted for an immediate troop pull out by Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) and Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE). This proposal amounts to no less that a total defeat for the United States. Should they be tried for treason?
These are just two examples of valid and verifiable acts by your heroes, the democrats, and they are a matter of public record.
Do you have any valid and verifiable reasons why George Bush should be tried for treason? The man has stood resolute in his campaign to try and defeat the Islamic terrorists rather than revert back to policies of inaction and no effective response to their attacks against Americans - attacks that ultimately culminated in the events of 9/11.
2007-10-01 09:15:57 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the two the Dem's' and re pubs' can hardly ever agree on something even whilst they % a similar element. till you pass to c-span you will no longer see a lot insurance of 0.33 occasion applicants. great firms make extensive contributions to applicants they help,you're constrained in how a lot you are able to donate to a candidate for my area. firms set up committees and communities to help and fund applicants. the latest financial disaster rules have been written by way of the banking marketplace for congress to make into regulation and it bit them interior the butt. the different subject is that some human beings vote for a million occasion each and all of the time,the two using fact they help that occasion each and all of the time and believe that's the only occasion to do whats top,or they are disenchanted with the different occasion for some reason. the two events % it their way and could compromise some to get their way. If what I examine on the information superhighway final evening is even 0.5 genuine,this election won't be counted besides. If we've yet another attack like 9/eleven or a important disaster in the past the elections F.E.M.A . will take administration and George Bush will strengthen into the genuine skill of government. If it happens after the elections and in the past the hot president takes workplace,i do no longer understand what's going to take place. G.W. signed an government order for the continuity of government and F.E.M.A. will take over and droop the form and the President may be the unity government. Congress and the spectacular courtroom will nonetheless exist yet could have little or no voice,the President has the main suitable say in all concerns. there became additionally yet another internet site conversing touching directly to the formation of the North American Union (Canada,U.S. and Mexico forming a union like the E.U. and the U.S. shape would be long previous.
2016-10-20 12:17:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definition of treason: the willful act of aiding and comforting the enemy
So Bush has been aiding the enemy how? Is he sitting there giving suicide bombers the material to do what they do? No?
How about instead of scrutinizing the President as a "traitor" you look at those like Rosie O'Donald, Cindy Shehan and George Soros? They've called "radical Christians" a bigger threat than Islams, terrorists who kill their own "freedom fighters" and America a bunch of "Nazis." Who is anti-American, Bush or the professor (name escapes me right now) that said the 9/11 victims got what they deserved?
2007-10-01 09:04:22 · answer #4 · answered by m 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Here we go again with questions like this. Don't people realize that if he could be tried for treason, could be impeached, they would jump on it?
With the exception of a few (VERY few), they've all been behind this from the beginning and people can't seem to see nor realize what's been going on behind closed doors. The wool has been is is being pulled over your eyes. Wake up.
No trials, no impeachment. They're not going to take a chance and perjure themselves. :)
2007-10-01 08:59:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You didn't mention what he had to do with 9/11. Or what that has to do with treason .
Do you think people without brains should be kept from posting questions ?
2007-10-01 08:59:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
No I don't believe so. How about the people who knocked down the Trade Center? Should we just say "oh well" or what? Over three thousand American lost their lives there and on our soil, who should pay? Bush said they would hear from us, and so they are.
should we just say "oh well" or what
2007-10-01 09:01:49 · answer #7 · answered by Alex G 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes! Main thing that haunts me is why if Moussaoui(20th hijacker) was is custody for weeks before 9/11 wasn't the plot foiled?Also why did FBI HQ in Washington deny Minneapolis office requests for FISA warrants?
What did Bush do about the briefing of 8/6/2001?
2007-10-01 08:58:41 · answer #8 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No, he shouldn't be tried for treason because he hasn't committed any treasonous acts.
2007-10-01 09:10:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
He should be tried for treason for giving our country away to anybody that can throw him a slice of pizza.
2007-10-01 09:05:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Wow another person who results to accusations without proof to back it up. It's obvious that it hasn't done any good. So unless you have proof to back it up, why do you continue to waste your time? Nobody cares about something with no logic.
2007-10-01 08:59:03 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋