For poor= 3
For Trader= 22
In Math= 4
2007-10-01 08:15:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by PAK ASIANS 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
4
2007-10-01 07:55:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Motherof2 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
5
2007-10-01 08:00:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cameron S 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
2+2= Baby
2007-10-01 07:55:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by sara76c 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
2 teach + 2 help = 4 ever
2007-10-01 07:59:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Crazy and Lovin It 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well...my personal opinion is that 2+2 does not equal ?
2007-10-01 08:41:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by boz4425 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
4. Simply because it is an educated answer to a ridiculously easy math problem. If one knows that, then they show acquired knowledge, fantastic. If someone uses a completely random statement and actually believes it, I would like to know how they perform order of operations...
2007-10-01 09:19:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sage G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
user-friendly expertise could say that 2+2=4. yet I truly have heard of synergy, that would convey forth something by any skill augmentative. Who knows, it could even convey forth ... promiscuity! depraved innovations!
2016-10-20 12:09:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are more than the sum of our parts, so the answer is 5.
2007-10-01 12:48:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
baba man migam emtiaz jam kon level 2 beshi too ye soalo dobar miporsi?
2007-10-01 07:59:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋