She should have been treated like any other criminal. If she was I hope the guards put two pairs of gloves on. Goodness knows she's been with every man in CA lol.
2007-10-01 05:09:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by !!! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no she wasnt. That was part of why the media and the public were outraged about it. And thats why she was moved to the Twin Towers facility.... cuz it was reported that she was not stripped searched and the inmates seent that on TV and so the second time around when they put her in jail, they moved her to Twin Towers due to the fact that they thought the inmates might cause her to be put in harms way.
2007-10-01 05:05:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by VMG 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
HELL NO! any man or woman who desires to incriminate and penitentiary a man or woman for purely getting intoxicated is nice out filled with affliction and hate and the stinkers who make weed unlawful are people who ought to be JAILED! Damned oppressive TYRANNICAL legislators like that could desire to be HANGED! it's time to DECRIMINALIZE WEED AND permit people who ABIDE with the help of THE regulation yet SMOKE WEED OFF THE HOOKS in any different case this is now not A unfastened usa AND it particularly is time FOR A BLOODY conflict ! ! the authorities HAS NO top to inform ME no remember if i'm able to GET severe OR now not and that they only USE THAT FOR LEVERAGE OVER the individuals and that they could desire to be PUBLICLY HANGED FOR IT!! definite it particularly is top I stated so ! ! The time is ripe for the regulation abiding electorate of united statesa. to upward thrust IN potential AND FLEX a touch MUSCLE AND TAKE some RIGHTS FOR OUR own!! we've a rustic TO TAKE returned FROM THE BANKER DICTATORS. Making it unlawful purely to get severe isn't in elementary terms completely without reason, yet is in elementary terms a potential of having legally spawned ability and leverage over the individuals who use it. there is a lot they are in a position to apply against those human beings which includes noticeably while they're making use of for a activity!! i think of we could desire to continuously injury people who refuse to decriminalize it and we incriminate the incriminators and spot how they prefer it! BLOOD FOR BLOOD! Then issues could exchange because of the fact in Washington and in different greater places of work could is nice.
2017-01-02 21:16:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you're so pre-occupied with the idea of Paris Hilton being stripped, perhaps you should write to her and tell her. I hear she's not fussy.
2007-10-01 05:08:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If any one has a problem in that area, it should be Paris and not you or me.
2007-10-01 05:08:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Swamy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
When they took her clothes off they couldn't find a body - they are still looking.
2007-10-01 05:02:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
She was asked this in an interview and she said that she was.
2007-10-01 04:59:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hamish 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If she was, is there a video to be released??
2007-10-01 04:59:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by M1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
hopefully
2007-10-01 05:06:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by pj 3
·
0⤊
0⤋