Utopia is a great principle for life
2007-10-01 02:57:50 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
utopia? It ain't no utopia.
Have you ever wondered why free trade is advocated for good and capital but not labor?
Borders are to keep people oppressed. Americans do not want borders because they know they are being protected from the consequences of their exploitation of foreign labor. If the labor market were liberalized, then there would be true free trade.
Besides, borders do not represent any other reality than that of power. I am not interested in power. I want to go to whatever river I wish whenever I want without having to rob it from others.
Borders fence us in, imprison us.
Peace.
PS: those who favor borders because they fear muslims or hispanics or simply foreigners. What is the difference between you and the Nazis? the KKK?
NO HUMAN BEING IS ILLEGAL. Only fascists disagree.
2007-10-01 03:17:40 · answer #1 · answered by Washington Irving 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
There are two possible scenarios that could yield a 'world with no borders.' One would be the total absence of political entities, if the world were in a state of total anarchy, or if it were simply devoid of human life, there would be no borders - the aftermath of a full scale nuclear war, for instance. The other would be the formation of a global government - but it would have to be one where all authority is centralized, or you'd have borders between administrative regions.
Niether sound particularly attractive.
2007-10-01 09:40:26 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
“start administration skill birth control.” No, start administration skill controlling the form of stay births. birth control skill controlling the form of conceptions. many times, even nevertheless, the two are lumped at the same time. Contraceptive units, case in point the condom and IUD’s, preclude births via combating theory, yet others, like the “tablet” preclude start via combating the embryo from arising interior the mum’s physique “birth control isn't an abortion.” Many varieties of what are many times mentioned as birth control, on the whole the “tablet”, are abortion via fact they preclude the “made of theory” from implanting interior the uterus of the mum. The embryo (which has, via the way, an entire, unique set of human DNA) is then expelled from the physique. This expulsion is prompted via the movements of the mum taking the tablet with the particular purpose of arising implantation very no longer likely. “…an abortion would not preclude theory.” No, it doesn’t, yet neither does the main frequently going on varieties of birth control ( a misnomer if there ever became one) used via women folk. per danger its time which you studied up a splash on precisely how the tablet works. It would not preclude birth control BTW: Why don’t you in basic terms call the “made of theory” what it rather is; a infant; an embryo; a fertilized egg? Do you think of it makes you sound “extra clinical” to easily describe it? That’s like continuously calling the sunlight “our universal power source ” and in no way in basic terms calling it “the sunlight”. stupid.
2016-12-28 08:51:56 · answer #3 · answered by salome 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can imagine a day when the human race is sufficently grown up to "have no borders" but today is not the day. Perhaps one day there will be no inherent evil in this world, one can only hope. Unfortunately as long as groups with evil intentions attempt to enforce their ideas at the point of a gun, there will be conflict because at some point in time those who do not wish to make everyone else in the world live in their image will defend themselves. A wise man once said "evil flourishes when good men do nothing".
2007-10-01 03:16:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Having a world without borders is the ultimate communist dream. And I think we know how all that turns out....we would have to throw away the constitution and compromise with all the other countries to create a new document of law. would we really want Russia, China, Mexico and other oppressive nations to take part in that? American sovereignty should never be given away.
"A nation without borders, is not a nation."
2007-10-01 03:07:38 · answer #5 · answered by Goldwater Conservative 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Someone forgot to tell you that Utopia moved. They packed up their commune and left after the 60's.
2007-10-01 03:04:45 · answer #6 · answered by Nikki 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
We have a world without borders for law-abiding citizens. Borders and laws are created for criminals and trespassers.
2007-10-01 03:21:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sorry...we didn't fight the Revolutionary War to be a part of a One World Government. The UN is a perfect example of why "utoria" is an unreal goal and a lotus land mentality.
God bless the USA, and our troops !
2007-10-01 03:16:46 · answer #8 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You seem to be one of those who can visualize whirled peas.
The only way I can imagine a world with no borders is a world with almost no people. If we were all dead, this would be a peaceful world.
2007-10-01 03:13:59 · answer #9 · answered by plezurgui 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I don't think the people of the US are ready, willing or able to just give away all the things we have worked for for over 200 years. Other countries should apply themselves and suffer like Americans did if they want our standard of living.
2007-10-01 03:09:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋