Why is Air America calling Iraq an "OCCUPATION"? Doesn't that hurt Democrat candidates like Hillary

Question

Can someone explain this to me - didn't major Democrats last week come out and say we'll be in Iraq at least till 2012 or 2013 or whatever year they said?

Doesn't this set up liberals who dine at the table of Air America and moveon dor org thought for not supporting the Hillary and other corporate whores?

Answer 1

Because it IS an occupation, perhaps? When a foreign power invades a sovereign nation and exerts its influence in every facet of the host nation's government and is primarily responsible for its security and order, it is considered to be an occupation.

I don't know why the majority of Americans along with the corporate media still refer to the occupation of Iraq as a "war" even though major combat operations ended years ago with the removal of the despotic regime that the US was actually at war with.

Answer 2

I advise that the better decrease for contributions be executed away with, and that the utmost payouts in retirement nonetheless stay as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social safety isn't a "supply away" application yet one that all of us make contributions to love a cost reductions plan, and could be shielded from different makes use of by way of the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? while you're so frightened approximately it then why do no longer you; first positioned it returned into the indoors maximum sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for their own interest, 2nd pay returned each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social safety and Medicare, 0.33 take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet under no circumstances paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it an analogous for each guy or woman; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they desire some thing greater they do it on their own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had under no circumstances been rather replaced. They, a set of scholars, pronounced that each and every physique expenditures of interest may well be 3% or much less for each guy or woman to alter into prosperous if needed (that would desire to be genuine additionally to taces). the ideal financial concern may well be, they reported, while there have been no expenditures of interest. Why no longer attempt this answer? the prosperous might nonetheless be prosperous. My question is: while soial safety turns right into a difficulty linked to federal bills, why no longer artwork with a balanced or income value variety and spend no greater beneficial than is presented in, as any kinfolk has to try for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents as a manner to get rules that serve the country? God bless united states of america.

Answer 3

Actually it has turned into an occupation. We went in and took down the dictator of the country and installed our puppet government. Just like we did in Germany and Japan after world war II we are hanging around to ensure things go the way we want them to go. That is called an occupation. We are occupying (staying) in another country not by invitation but because we forced our way in. We were told that the mission was accomplished. Once that happened all things afterward can be called occupation.

Answer 4

I think Air America is right on this point. What else would you call it other than an occupation? Or do the Repubs still buy the BS of it as liberating the Iraqi people?

Answer 5

Maybe that means that Air America does more than read the talking points from political candidates.

Answer 6

Why do people make an assumption that talk radio or PACs are directly linked to any candidates?

Answer 7

*LOL* Calling any Democrat a cooperate whore is the ultimate hypocrisy.

Answer 8

I don't why Al Qaida & MoveOn.org & Air America call it an occupation.

Answer 9

Never heard of 'em