2007-10-01 01:16:29 · 14 answers · asked by Daver 4 in Sports ➔ Cricket
yes,no appeal and no reply.even if the batsman was cleaned bowled,no appeal no decision.it happened to me in a school match many years ago,i caught the batsman fair and square,nobody appealed,i was too embarrassed to appeal ,so he stayed in--i was not so shy next time i caught someone i can tell you.
2007-10-01 01:55:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. even if the batsman is clearly out, the umpire cant and wont raise the finger unless appealed by the players (this only applies for lbw etc. not catch out)
2007-10-01 09:57:34 · answer #2 · answered by Al Qiyamah{top lawyer inshAllah} 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it\s in the rules. The umpire has to be called on to give an out.
2007-10-01 01:30:21 · answer #3 · answered by fruitybat101 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes , otherwise if the bowler thinks it is not out and the umpire gives it out it will be insulting for the Batsman.
2007-10-01 19:24:47 · answer #4 · answered by Abbhinav Venkat 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes there should be an appeal by the fielders & bowlers, or else the umpire would just keep quite & stay.
2007-10-01 06:28:59 · answer #5 · answered by Nafeez Nash 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-10-01 03:36:19 · answer #6 · answered by Gagan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-10-01 03:15:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-10-01 01:20:06 · answer #8 · answered by deadmeatuk2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the batsman always has the benefit of doubt. no appeal, no response......thats for LegBeforeWicket that is
2007-10-02 02:22:42 · answer #9 · answered by taf 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For all other methos of dismissal other than bowled, someone has to appeal for the decision
2007-10-01 03:16:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋