Firstly they are innocent because none of the lies told by the Portuguese police to scare innocent witnesses have worked. The other thing is that any lawyer would get the case thrown out due to an internet and media hate campaign preventing a fair trial.
The hate spilled over to the media and thereafter to the police.
All this with not a single thread of real evidence, just police tactics--look back and you will see--all the evidence came from the police and it was ALL subsequently dropped.
2007-10-01
00:54:46
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
"Innocent witnesses" should read "innocent people"
2007-10-01
00:56:08 ·
update #1
Justubackagain. I have no "evidence" but neither has anyone else. There is no evidence that you did not kill her but that does not make grounds for prosecution, and definitely does not make rounds for a brainless hate campaign
2007-10-01
01:19:51 ·
update #2
Yes mike,there has been no concrete evidence from day one,and even though they tried to frame the parents with their ridiculous accusations,they came up with nothing.
2007-10-01 00:59:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
"Firstly they are innocent because..."
WOW WHAT A STATEMENT
"...none of the lies told by the Portuguese police to scare innocent witnesses have worked." --- WOW ANOTHER GREAT STATEMENT.
"The other thing is that any lawyer would get the case thrown out due to an internet and media hate campaign preventing a fair trial." ---LOLOLOL -- LAWYERS DO NOT THROW CASES OUT. COURTS DO. And they can only do that is there is a trial. Would like to see the McCanns on trial ? I would love to !!! SO LAWYERS ADVISE THEIR CLIENTS ON HOW WEIGHTY THE EVIDENCE AGAINST THEM IS -- and the McCanns lawyer gave them the advice we all already know -"there is enough evidence already to convict ... you are going to be charged." Instead the Police made them official suspects... until more evidence came from Birmingham. In the meantime the McCanns fled to England, LOL !!. That makes them "DESPERADOS" as they call them in the States !!
"The hate spilled over to the media and thereafter to the police." ----- HUH ?!
"All this with not a single thread of real evidence, just police tactics--look back and you will see--all the evidence came from the police and it was ALL subsequently dropped."
NOW YOU'RE CONFUSING ME !
2007-10-01 01:17:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by RED-CHROME 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
In my journey that's often defended in a variety of procedures: a million) It did no longer take place. She replaced into older than that. (yet once you're saying that, you're throwing out ahadith that are seen valid, which opens up an entire different can of worms.) 2) issues have been distinctive back then. (This will improve the question of why some countries *right this moment* place the marriageable age of girls at 9 as a results of fact they do no longer decide to outlaw something that the prophet did. additionally, if the Qur'an is undying, meant as a handbook continuously, why might God have his prophet do some thing that would later grow to be unacceptable?) except you settle for that having intercourse with a 9-year-old female is ethical, you could no longer create a valid, internally consistent protection of Muhammad's marriage to Aisha.
2016-10-10 02:28:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How do you know the police are lying?
If any lawyer can get the case thrown out of court why hire 4 of the highest lawyers one an expert in extradition.
The British media have not been against the McCanns they have only reported what they have been told by the family and Friends.
And how can you can be sure none of the evidence exists? Even the family and Kate herself admitted there was DNA found in the car and death was sensed on Kate by cadava dogs. They even admitted to the dogs smelling death in the car. You say "All the evidence came from from the police" where on earth was it meant to come from? it's their job to collect evidence? And where on earth did you see it had all been dropped. If it has been dropped why are the McCanns still suspects?
2007-10-01 01:16:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Charley 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
I would very much like to see a trial with a decided outcome. Either innocent or guilty. In my heart-of-hearts I don't believe they are guilty, but then I am not infallible (I thought OJ was guilty! - oh, and Michael Jackson, too). The parents have been put on trial by the media and the public and they need this case to be properly resolved if they ever want any form of life after this.
Shambo: How many "anti's" reported that vile person whose question you mention? Did you?
2007-10-01 01:20:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by True Blue Brit 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
If the McCanns had acted in a more normal way and not turned the whole thing into a circus ,and answered all the questions and not condoned all the media spin they would have had a great deal more public backing. Now even the grannie is coming out and any drugs that may be found in any dna testing must have been given to Maddy by the abducter !!!
I tried to answer Shambos question but alas the Yahoo police had deleted it. It all stinks.
2007-10-01 01:10:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by little weed 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Regardless of whether they are directly responsible of the hideous crime, They are most definitely responsible for leaving 3 very young children alone in a foreign country while they went out on the lash. I have a two year old and there is no way i could be certain that she would sleep all night, with out waking for something or other. If they had been a working class couple from anywhere they would have had social services all over them and they would have been rightfully banged up.
2007-10-01 01:15:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
There is evidence that they Neglected their 3 small children to go out drinking, what about that?
2007-10-01 04:47:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
it will be a shame for them then, if the case gets thrown out of court on a technicality.
They will live with it hanging over their heads, and the same people you are talking about will continue to believe the same as they do now.
2007-10-01 01:01:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by !Lady Stormy! 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
bravo u have all the answers
at the end of the day she was neglected by her parents and they are guilty of that just remember its about maddy not her parents
2007-10-01 03:22:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋