I wrote a similar piece in 1967. The title was "I".
2007-10-01 00:27:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by TD Euwaite? 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
IF only this poem was longer
it wouldn't be the same
but give the opening title
a completely unrelated name
entitle it IS, just to confuse the masses :-)
Great work.
2007-10-01 01:24:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, not to be harsh and you said to be critical, but this is simply a postmodern effort that could be construed as profound, but not to the eye or ear of someone who appreciates poetry in its finer form
2007-10-01 21:01:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by LadyRebecca 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
IF u should some more, I would say yes, but this is the shortest poem that I have read!
2007-10-04 14:04:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♫Di [Pro-Love, Anti-Hate]♫ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is totally confusing, could you explain the underlying message in this most elaborate work.
2007-10-01 12:29:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dondi 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
its an excellent poem i'd buy a copy of it if you published it
good things about it:
easy to memorize
short to recite
multiple meanings
hard to misspell
makes you think about life
2007-09-30 23:25:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Landon K 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
The rhyme scheme is brilliant, but you should work a little more on the rhythm. Good job!
2007-10-01 00:06:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lady Annabella-VInylist 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well I think it is obvious to me at least, Dante's A Divine Comedy!
2007-10-03 23:45:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by kissaled 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was a little short, but over all, was fantastic! Keep up the good work.
2007-09-30 23:27:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kamy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't have time to read this now. I will come back and comment later--there are too many layers here to read all at once.
2007-10-01 01:54:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Todd 7
·
1⤊
0⤋