The question is only for those who technically believe in pyramid shapes' capability in harnessing cosmic energy. A certain Filipino had already claimed that a triangle base is better that square base because it will not require alignment with the earth's direction.
2007-09-30 22:35:49 · 6 answers · asked by Manuel 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
triangular, of course.
2007-09-30 22:38:37 · answer #1 · answered by Dolphin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The part that has been cut off is also a square-based pyramid. Imagine the whole pyramid. Subtract the volume of the sliced off part from the volume of the whole pyramid. I'd have to take a minute to fully convince myself of this, but I'm pretty sure that the side length of a slice like that is going to be proportional to distance from the top of the pyramid. That is, the fact that the side length is 2 where the slice occurs, and the side length is 4 at the bottom, means that the slice is 1/2 of the way from the top to the bottom. So the whole pyramid is 12 units high, and the little pyramid that has been sliced off is 6 units high.
2016-05-17 23:10:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There ain't no such animal as cosmic energy, thats really cosmic man, it's like bad karma, man.
2007-09-30 23:38:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Superstition is trangular. Obscurantism is a square. Bigotry is circular.
2007-09-30 22:49:41 · answer #4 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Triangle may be the shape.But it is almost a triangle but it is not a triangle.
2007-09-30 22:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're both useless. What a silly question.
2007-09-30 22:39:11 · answer #6 · answered by Leviathan 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋