I have yet to hear a logical explanation that the McCanns murdered their daughter.I know 80% of the time it is the parents but,I believe the McCanns are the other 20%.They took a huge risk leaving their children...Now they are paying for it.Dont forget,most of the group were leaving their kids too.
Some parents take risks and are lucky nothing goes wrong.The McCanns were not and they are paying for it in the worst possible way.The PJ trying to convince us of the McCanns guilt has made me more convinced of their innocence.Let's not forget,right from the start,it was the McCanns who said not enough was being done.That speaks volumes alone.At the end of the day,Madeleine is/has suffered and so are the parents.They get my full support every step of the way.
That is my opinion,you dont have to agree,I'm just telling you anyway.
2007-09-30 21:37:43 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Great opinion WelshCake!
And heres why i believe in they didn't murder their Madeleine, as well :
1. 'cos theres no proof they did.
2. 'cos of the way they strive to spread awareness of their Madeleine with no regard to the flak & scrutiny hurled against them.
3. 'cos till now there is no little body found in spite of experts, sniffer dogs & the worldwide pressure on the PJ.
4. 'cos there is no motive.
5. 'cos there is no history or indication of past abuse, unstability or unhappiness in that family.
6. 'cos IF they were, even if it were accidental, they would have cracked by now.
7. 'cos all the accusations against them are based on mere HERESAY.
2007-09-30 21:45:13 · answer #1 · answered by Faith 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
There are of direction, 2 facets to each tale. I attempt to maintain an open brain. In the day prior to this's paper there have been feedback made that the burning of Robert Murat's pal's auto used to be now not an remoted occasion. A prior auto, and a further auto belonging to a resident within the constructing he lives in, have been additionally burned. Before Madeleine McCann disappeared. If that is real, whilst this does not imply that the McCanns are blameless, it surely casts doubt at the conception that the McCanns have something to do with it. The guy obviously has enemies, rather then the McCanns. Secondly, whether or not or now not you think that the McCanns did kill their daughter, or had something to do along with her disappearance, the newspapers have been out of order. Which is why they apologized and paid up, alternatively than face an ordeal. If for one minute the McCanns have been responsible and there used to be evidence of that, they could have by no means submitted to the humiliation and could have confronted the McCanns in court docket. You are correct that the newspapers are a car, they will have to document data, and now not reviews. Your complete factor is headquartered at the McCanns guilt - have you ever ever regarded that they probably blameless?
2016-09-05 13:24:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good for you! I don't think they did it either, on balance.
I'd have to see far more evidence than has been provided so far to believe them guilty.
I've just given some of the reasons I think they are innocent here
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aq8jj5lJ5utePHTGJ67M9k4gBgx.;_ylv=3?qid=20070930140248AAqpOqM&show=7#profile-info-ba33a2746165fe763ecc4501e04dd4ccaa
2007-09-30 21:52:04 · answer #3 · answered by Netty 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm with you - I find it very hard to believe that they harmed their child. I don't think anyone but a psychopath could harm their own child and keep a campaign like this going and there is nothing to suggest that they are psychopaths.
2007-09-30 21:43:21 · answer #4 · answered by Skidoo 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
What exactly are you asking?
2007-09-30 23:42:15 · answer #5 · answered by blahblahblah 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋