English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I thought no matter what color you are you can be racist against the other color or relgion or the list goes on.

Isn't Racism just that? RACISM?

2007-09-30 20:39:23 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

No colors were mentioned when I looked up the deffinition.

rac·ism (rszm) KEY

NOUN:

The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
Discrimination or prejudice based on race.


http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/racism

2007-09-30 20:56:34 · update #1

I cannot even find a dictionary that has a deffinition for reverse racism, unless you look at the urban dictionary.... and that one is made by people for people almost like yahoo answers.

2007-09-30 20:58:21 · update #2

5 answers

Yes.
But now let us get into semantics. Racism has generally only been used when a white person ridicules a black person. However, in the last 15-20 years it has been used to describe a lot of things, but still prevalently white/black issues.

Reverse descrimination is when a white man is ridiculed/given less opportunity/etc...by a black man.

Needless to say, In all reality, discrimination is just that. It doesn't matter what color, religion, creed, etc..., you should just be considered by your merit.

2007-09-30 20:53:35 · answer #1 · answered by txpyxie 4 · 1 0

Racism, yes,I agree with you that color doesn't matter. But reverse racism is a fall out of racism and can only happen in either democratic societies or when the victims of racism come to power.Ask an hyper sensitive American on a racial issue and hear him what African Americans are doing to them through social security,kids allowances and other dole outs.That's the reverse racism at it's best.

2007-09-30 20:52:33 · answer #2 · answered by brkshandilya 7 · 0 0

See that is purely it. Your vantage element is distinctive than the subsequent person. you need to understand that white people have been those to blame for racism initially . the assumption of race isn't even authentic. that is an invented theory in our usa that has stirred the pot for an prolonged time. Wheras different cultures have ethnicities, we've "races". I agree that racism and discrimination is incorrect no count who's in the back of it. I additionally understand that there are a number of white people who're no longer racist and are oftentimes caught up in being falsely accused of being racist, despite the fact that, there are a number of greater recepients of actually racism. to totally savour this, you need to be on the receiving end of the racism to hold close it. in any different case, that is going to continually be denied, debated,etc... renowned it or no longer, racism is authentic, it grew to become into created in an extremely strategic way and consistent with which section you're on, your information of that is limited.

2016-11-06 22:08:03 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I do believe that term comes from assuming that only whites can be racist. It also tends to suggest that they deserve to have it done 'back' to them, and that it doesn't really count as racism when it's done to them.

2007-09-30 20:45:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes

2007-09-30 20:41:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers