English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

wow. kapal muks finally bowed down.

2007-09-30 19:27:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Not guilty unless proven beyond reasonable doubt. His resignation from his post does not signify his guilt or innocence. Let the court of law, in this case the Senate, prove whether he is guilty or not.

2007-10-02 08:14:54 · answer #2 · answered by annabelle p 7 · 0 0

Guilty. The resignation was due a long, long time ago. Next, he should undergo trial. I just do not know if he will be immune from prosecution.

2007-10-01 03:01:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

He should have left immediately when he was implicated, and admitted he took those China trips.

Finally, tinablan din. After causing all of us millions in pesos for those hearings in the Senate, etc.

2007-10-01 02:37:01 · answer #4 · answered by boyplakwatsa.com 7 · 0 0

If your report is accurate, then I admire the man.

The action shows dignity and should not be construed as a sign of guilt. Any public official, faced with controversies, should take his action as an example..

2007-10-01 03:13:43 · answer #5 · answered by Aref H4 7 · 0 0

QUILTY in all charges...
automation of comelec,
hello gloria, ehe...garcie,
bedol 12-0 election in Mindanao
and the latest... NBN deal
hope he take along his Boss...
sooner!

2007-10-01 04:39:50 · answer #6 · answered by MaSTeR 3 · 1 0

he says he's not guilty. it says here:

http://www.gmanews.tv/story/62629/Abalos-resigns-post-amid-ZTE-mess-says-hell-face-critics

2007-10-01 04:07:12 · answer #7 · answered by bReAd-WiNnEr 3 · 0 0

given the evidences laid out before, yes. those were pretty strong evidences against him.

2007-10-01 19:19:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

obvious bah?

2007-10-01 05:27:03 · answer #9 · answered by m0cca 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers