the annexation of hawaii was not exactly as you described it. is this imperialism?

Question

Annexation of Hawaii
The Kingdom of Hawai'i was long an independent monarchy in the mid-Pacific Ocean. During the 19th century, the first American missionaries and then business interests began to play major roles in the islands. Most notable were the powerful fruit and sugarcane corporations such as the Big Five, which included Castle & Cooke, Alexander & Baldwin, C. Brewer & Co., Amfac and Theo H. Davies & Co..
The Big Five engineered, financed and directed military coup, deposing and imprisoning the monarchy's last native Hawaiian leader, Queen Lili'uokalani in 1894. Although censured by the U.S. president and Congress, the Big Five maintained control until 1898, when president of the Republic of Hawai'i, Sanford Dole, was finally offered and agreed to annexation by the United States. The republic was dissolved in 1900 when the country became a territory of the US. Following voter approval of the Admission of Hawai'i Act, the Territory of Hawaii, on August 21, 1959, became the state of Hawai'i and the 50th state of the United States.

Answer 1

And the question is... B? False? An instrument used for baking?

Answer 2

In staring on the background of Hawaii, it particularly is considerable to to distinguish between deepest monetary aggression and real U.S. coverage. As Kono Kohako wisely factors out, a great variety of deepest planters, now not in elementary terms from the U.S., particularly took over the islands. This turn into now and returned performed with cooperation from the locals, who have been nevertheless warring with one yet another, and now and returned searching for foreigners as allies of their own wars. A united close by Hawaii exceeded off, if in any respect, very overdue interior the colonial era. So those have been deepest, now not national, monetary firms. then you particularly get 2 issues coming jointly -- one is the will of the USA to have Hawaii below the effective wing of the U.S., now not the "colonial" administration of yet another usa (in step with danger an selfish view, yet international locations do have those), and the desire to own Pearl Harbor, as Kono Kohako defined. it particularly is somewhat hassle-free at that factor for the U.S. to have confidence that annexing the Hawaiian Islands as a ingredient of the U.S. is useful to the U.S. besides as to Hawaii. i'm never valuable it had something in any respect to do with "monetary imperialism." Pineapple and sugar cane weren't that considerable even then. looking returned, and devoid of in any way minimizing what turn into performed to close by Hawaiians interior the technique, i'm undecided i'm able to assert Hawaii could now be extra efficient off devoid of having turn right into a U.S. possession, and then a state. it could particularly be worse off. Having it stay a Polynesian paradise devoid of outdoors impact turn into some thing that under no circumstances could have exceeded off, U.S. involvement or now not.

Answer 3

American / Euro-centrists must say that USA bought Kingdom of Hawaii and China invaded it-long-owned-part Tibet!

Answer 4

That looks like simple imperialism