they look awful against pitt, but then show off there offense against a weak defensive cincy team. week 3, they decided to play what seemed only 1 half against oakland which wasnt enough then was iced. lastly they beat another division rival and thought to be playoff contender baltimore
2007-09-30 17:20:31 · 11 answers · asked by C Dawg 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
they need defense.... which is a wierd statement because the browns usualy have no offense, but a good defense
2007-09-30 17:25:02 · answer #1 · answered by Ronnie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mediocre???? are you kidding me..they just beat the ravens and cinci. they lost to the oakland raiders by 3 on a blocked FG what are you talkng about. I think everyone agrees the ravens have the best Dfence and the Browns made them look like the bengals. This shows how good pitt really is and it was a rivalry gm. anything happens in those. Ask USC fans. They have a steady and consistant running attack and derek anderson has yet to have a bad game. I think they will barely miss the play offs because the dont know how to get the easy W's. but watch out they have a chance of upsetting a lot of good teams
2007-09-30 17:42:07 · answer #2 · answered by THUNDERDOME 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The way this season is going, it is too early to tell just who is a powerhouse and who is not.
Cleveland can certainly throw their name in the hat for good team honors. However, those could end up being their only W's, you just never know.
Everyone is annointing the Cowboys, well, I am not feeling it, but I am not feeling it about anyone yet. Ok, the Patriots, yes, I said it, (yack). And the Colts have all W's, no matter how close in couple of games.
Just a crazy weekend all together, College and Pros, which does not help figure anyone out.
2007-09-30 17:26:15 · answer #3 · answered by Robert C 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the ravens were exposed by a young and improving browns team. anderson might just have "it". i'm not sure yet, but to me today was an impressive divisional win against a good team. i think i may over-rate the ravens D based on past performence. it's still an impressive win for those brownies and anderson! plus they can let quin develop now...NOT BAD!
braylon edwards, winslow, ol' man lewis, hmmmmm, maybe not bad!
2007-09-30 17:43:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They will be in games as long as thier defense can hold them in games in the first half. They have a decent enough offense to score points so If thier defense can hold them in games they have a chance.
2007-09-30 17:54:32 · answer #5 · answered by Chris 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Easy answer, they are very sporadic. I'll give them some credit when they can get some consitancy. They play the Patriots next week, and don't expect too many miracles.
2007-09-30 17:25:57 · answer #6 · answered by atvman_400 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are good enough to win a max of six games this year, assuming they keep starting Anderson and not Quinn.
2007-09-30 17:52:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're mediocre to say the best. They definitely have areas that need improvement. Problem is that you never know which team is going to show up.
2007-09-30 17:27:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
better than last year. a little
2007-09-30 17:24:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well they seem to be better then last year...
2007-10-01 00:55:18 · answer #10 · answered by Dea B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋