Mark Schlereath, or whatever his name is, Sean Salisbury, and the rest of the ESPN's "I never really did anything in the NFL" analysts army are utter jokes. They called for the replacement of Rex Grossman by Brian Gresie now they look like retards.
Besides Emmit Smith, Tom Jackson, and Steve Young, the rest of their analysts are basically vagabonds who give useless opinions week in and week out.
2007-09-30 17:08:18 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I think 85-90% of all analyst don't know what they're talking about. That goes for the media as well. However, no one ever calls them out for their past comments.
2007-09-30 17:11:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Well, the bears did need to change QBs, I mean grossman blows and he is too short. he is really 5-10 not 6-1. griese isn't much better though.
Espn does have way too many guys on the panel. I mean they might as well be in a locker room instead of a studio. I'm glad sterling sharpe is gone and michael irvin. tom jackson is alright and young is ok, but they all start goofing around when they all are together on the set. they talk and laugh over each other and get all giddy. plus they need to stop that thing where they show you a play and they are all standing in the studio with the football and they pretend they are about to play two hand touch....thats way over played.
2007-10-01 00:15:26 · answer #2 · answered by sebastian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you the ESPN analyists always get stuff wrong. The only way to know about a team is to watch and follow them week in and week out. All there guys do is watch the highlights of each game and form an opinion. example. Shaun Alexander is the most overrated runningback in the nfl but yet somehow everybody still calls him a good runner when he is a p***y and never hits a hole hard.
2007-10-01 00:57:39 · answer #3 · answered by Chris 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let me tell u something......Sean Salisbury knows his stuff about the NFL, As far as the rest of the ESPN commentators, I feel that tey are biased. They love USC, the RED SOX, and don't give the Yankees any respect
2007-10-01 00:14:45 · answer #4 · answered by kinggator3133 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Give the analysts some credit, he played as good as Grossman ever does.
2007-10-01 00:12:47 · answer #5 · answered by atvman_400 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think most of them are. Especially the ones that didn't play the game. I just don't understand Merrill Hodge's issue with Philly fans.
2007-10-01 01:38:58 · answer #6 · answered by Tommy R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they suppose to know something about football,sometimes they do and more times then not they're talking out of there butts
2007-10-01 00:25:26 · answer #7 · answered by thomasl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, most of them are former players...So, I guess they know something about football...Whether they are experts is probably another story...
2007-10-01 00:11:39 · answer #8 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the time they do the latter.
2007-10-01 01:02:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody knew what the hell they where talking about this weekend.
2007-10-01 00:16:46 · answer #10 · answered by Robert C 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋