Do you think the libs repeating that "Bush will invade Iran" is a scare tactic used to gain support?

Question

...for 08 elections?

Remember it is the libs not cons that keep repeating over and over that Bush will invade or is trying to invade Iran.

Answer 1

Yes and that is very true Nobody said anything about Iran until a lib read it on moveon or some other propaganda site.

Answer 2

No it is not a scare tactic

It is a true tactic

Bush has invaded two countries, one under questionable reasons, the other under bogus reasons. What would make anyone believe he wouldn't invade Iran, especially since he declaired their whole military as terrorist, is beyond me.

==============
The supply weapons to kill our troops reason to bomb them back into the stone age is laughable, considering we supply the world with at least 36% of the worlds arms. Many of which end up killing us. Seems to me, we should bomb our military industrial complex first.

Source: a 2005 congressional report
Link: http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/BigBusiness.asp

Besides, considering our governments dismal record in telling the truth, how in the hell do we really know Iran is supplying the insurgents? For all we know, it could be South Africa, or hell, even us.
==============

Peace

Jim

.

Answer 3

Nope. Even though I consider myself a conservative I have no doubt that he will continue to invade other countries and establish puppet governments in an attempt expand the US empire. I have lost all hope that I once had in Bush.

Answer 4

i do no longer think of GWB grew to become into clever adequate to have some plan in 9/11. Plus i do no longer choose for to think of that he did. reason what ensue there grew to become right into a heartless component to do. I attempt to no longer get all conspiracy theory yet i think of he or his father grew to become right into a reason they attacked. Then i could desire to be all incorrect and it grew to become into purely undesirable success on his section that it happened for the duration of his term. i think a hundred% he's applying the "concern of greater assaults" to justify staying over there so long. i do no longer care what all of us says. Theres continually going to be milisa communities over there which will continually hate us. we are able to in no way supply up that. i think of they must rigidity much less approximately "construction decrease back their goverment" and start up engaged on ours.

Answer 5

I don't recall many liberals calling Iran "evil" and sending carrier groups off Iranian shores.
It's that chucklehead in the white house that has been doing that.

Answer 6

Why are you standing with the libs? It is not a bad thing to attack Iran! Our President Bush is prepared to move forward with the War of Terror and take on Iran. Stand By Our Man.

Answer 7

Then why is Bush looking for reasons to attack them?
They talk about Iranians coming across the border with weapons and agents..........we have yet to see one shred of proof!Sorry but Bushs' word aint worth spit!
Especially when you consider he IGNORED national security and terrorism until after we were attacked!

Answer 8

Libs and cons... libs and cons.... libs and cons...

You are all so paranoid of each other... Your own question sounds paranoid. Are you scared or something? If not, then there would be no need of this question. If you are scared then you are paranoid.

Answer 9

I think they are really scared. It does look like that's where he's headed to me too, but I don't know if he has the authority.

Answer 10

Let them repeat it.


Any true American should want us to do so. Not invade but a heavy bombing campaign.


They have committed acts of war against us by providing devices that killed our troops.

That no matter how you spin it is an act of war

Answer 11

If so, it might be backfiring against them. Even France is talking tough on Iran.