See what I mean:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070930195312AA0q8G4&r=w#NZZVBm_kL1Ac514stPxm
2007-09-30 16:01:43 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
First off, the "progressives" are so embarrassed being called LIBERALS, that they had to change to "progressive"
Secondly, the 2000 elections put millions of LIBTURDS into therapy. Psychiatrists had a name for their sickness "P.E.S.T".....(post election syndrome trauma).
2007-09-30 16:18:07 · answer #1 · answered by george s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm going to upload my salute, as this question somewhat gave me a chortle! :-D The expert place of the Catholics--which i grew to become into, until now I...properly...wasn't--is that the universe began while God created some thing out of no longer something, and that, as quickly as guy developed, God instilled him with a soul. Pope John Paul the 2d stated Evolution grew to become into greater advantageous than basically a hypothesis. The Church is careful to stay interior the area that technology has no longer (unanimously, a minimum of) occupied. So somewhat, that is fundamentalists that are the difficulty. Even the Christians locate their adherence to lack of understanding stressful. chatting with fundamentalists, i might advise, is greater like speaking directly to the cheese--each little thing is going in one hollow and out the different, and after a whilst, the full ingredient starts to sniff.
2016-11-06 21:47:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is far to easy to use sound bites and not really take the time to investigate.
It is also easy to hide behind an avatar and express frustration.
I find it far more healthy to keep myself educated and respectfully vocal.
Oh and I am a Republican...evangelical Christian..lol
I love words and really make every attempt to know what a word means because it is too easy to just throw words out there.
2007-09-30 16:10:27 · answer #3 · answered by debrawashburn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you look beyond the hype, you'll notice what hypocrites the leftist/socialist are.
they LOVE to point the finger and say you're intolerant, when you aren't, and under that cover they continue being intolerant.
remember the "politics of personal destruction"?
same deal.
it's a tool for the socialists to throw you on defense, when they are exposed, while the continue on offense.
2007-10-01 02:35:01 · answer #4 · answered by afratta437 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Within her question, she rephrased herself and changed her point to the fact that she disagrees with republicans. Hardly intolerant.
Had she been intolerant, I would have responded with "there are usually a few nuts in a bowl of chex mix".
Every group has it's intolerant members, even yours.
2007-09-30 16:08:44 · answer #5 · answered by joecool123_us 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Okay, you've found one intolerant progressive. Now check the remaining 150 million and get back to me, and then I'll answer.
Or, you could just admit that you're making a wild generalization about an enormous group based on the attitude of one person.
2007-09-30 16:05:10 · answer #6 · answered by Steve 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
What does this really have to do with politics? This just looks like someone whining.... get over it, this is just yahoo answers.
2007-09-30 16:15:49 · answer #7 · answered by cattledog 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Genesis, you forget Bill O'Reilly. One person is not the whole group. I for one don't hate Republicans, I hate what is being done to this country while they are in the White House. There is a difference.
2007-09-30 16:13:53 · answer #8 · answered by outsider_27 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Well, I didn't realize Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin and Glen Beck were "progressives".
Thanks for the clarification.
.
2007-09-30 16:06:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
because we are expose them, and that makes them look and sound stupid
2007-09-30 16:08:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋