English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-30 14:28:19 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

17 answers

No, the pet population is out of control as it is. There are plenty of cats and dogs who are homeless and need good homes. Look on some bulletin boards around your town. Most of the time people are giving away free kittens/puppies (of course you would have to pay for their shots.) You can also stop by a veterinary office - they always have some animal up for adoption, or know of someone you can contact.

I would personally leave the breeding to the professionals.

2007-09-30 14:39:16 · answer #1 · answered by Cedes 2 · 1 0

regrettably, the animal rights people take opportunities to surrender millers and attempt to get the regulations utilized to all of us. there are a number of stable breeders obtainable that are caught interior the warfare of removing domestic dog generators. greater advantageous, how are you able to tell if the placement is a byb who's purely breeding for the $$$ or a valid breeder who has spent a life-time discovering appropriate to the breed, showing and spends the time it takes to locate the perfect canines to reproduce with a view to make the breed greater appropriate? those are difficult issues to legislate. One theory is for AKC to no longer settle for registrations for those places breeding greater advantageous than X canines according to 3 hundred and sixty 5 days yet they do no longer choose for to try this because of the fact they choose for the money too. So there's a catch 22 situation. the perfect ingredient is to instruct people as to what to seem for in a to blame breeder and why they must care. Then those clientele can vote with their pocketbooks and go away the BYB with countless unsold domestic canines.

2016-11-06 21:37:56 · answer #2 · answered by clapper 4 · 0 0

Years ago I bred my Dobie a couple of times. I quit because it worried me terribly that maybe they wouldn't get a good home. Way too much stress plus the litter cost me a total of $600 and I didn't even get their ears done. That was for food, dew claws, and tails.
Cat multiplication also convinced me to not have more animals. If you take one cat who has 5 kittens, and those 5 kittens have 5, then that is 25 plus the Mom. If those 25 each have 5 kittens then that is 125. The 125 each have 5 and hat is 625. Just one more generation after that is 3,125 cats born. Just 5 generations and so it goes. My animals all get spayed by 6 months. Mmm

2007-09-30 15:12:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 2 1

We did, since they're purebred AKC miniature poodles. We let our girl have two litters before getting her and the babies' daddy fixed(we owned both), and we still have one from the first litter. The others went to good homes, save for ONE that we had to take back and find a better home for, because the guy who bought him was negligent and abusive to the poor puppy. :(

2007-09-30 14:48:17 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 2 1

I breed with my pets all the time.

2007-09-30 14:34:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

No way. My pet mice are rescued wild mice and it would not be proper to breed captive wild mice.

2007-09-30 14:39:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

No, she's fixed. We should never breed or buy when shelter animals die for lack of a home.

2007-09-30 14:31:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

NEVER-- there are enough pets that need loving homes already.....

check out your local humane society... the statistics will make you weep.....

2007-09-30 14:30:46 · answer #8 · answered by from HJ 7 · 1 1

No. We're just friends. I prefer to keep things casual.

2007-09-30 14:41:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I breed my chiuhauha .. I just wanted him to hump something before i got his balls cut off lol!

2007-09-30 14:31:27 · answer #10 · answered by Chrissy 3 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers