We may look at people who eat dogs as bad or barbaric. But we eat pork & pigs are smarter than dogs. We wouldn't consider eating our pet parrot but we eat chicken.
2007-09-30 13:30:11 · 5 answers · asked by ? 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Actually Jolly Rogers, Humans are naturally herbivores, things changed after "the fall of man" in the bible.
2007-10-02 13:27:37 · update #1
You got a great point going. I don't see the difference either. They are all still animals. Have you ever been around a pig? They are brilliant, just as dogs and cats are... and I had a chicken and a duck as pets I got one year... they were smart too.
2007-09-30 13:35:43 · answer #1 · answered by ϑennaß 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The physique of thoughts of the guy is the only distinction. maximum all animals could be tamed and grow to be pets, and that consists of those you eat. that is a few thing to think of roughly. Being an omnivorous species isn't something to be pleased with.
2016-10-10 01:57:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is all relative to what the social norm is for each individual. We have been programed a certain way.
2007-09-30 13:35:05 · answer #3 · answered by Jellicle Cat 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You eat what you are familiar with in your culture. I have been offered many strange critters served in many ways in many foreign (to me) places.
2007-09-30 13:40:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
And the point is? Humans are omnivores, depending on your "belief" we evolved or were created that way. (Note evolution is not a belief, it is a proven scientific fact).
2007-09-30 13:37:06 · answer #5 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋