2007-09-30 12:05:30 · 9 answers · asked by IslandOfApples 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Hm, no, but that doesn't mean the designer has to be conscious of the design.
2007-09-30 12:19:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No I don't
And as for the designer needing a designer.
If the designer lives outside of time it is very easy to see that a designer does not need it's own designer. What existed before time. The designer. Think of our existence as a great mural, that the designer could view all happenings at the same instance and interact with all existence at the same instant. Time would mean nothing to a designer that exists outside of time. Giving it the ultimate ability to create and recreate at will.
I really don't think ID(intelligent design) is really in the realm of science yet but it is worth continuing the search for a smoking gun for design.
2007-09-30 22:56:58 · answer #2 · answered by impstout2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. What you perceive as 'design' in the natural world is no more than an infinite sequence of 'adaptations' which have either worked, or not worked to the advantage of the organism. If the former, the species is still around. If not, it's as extinct as the Dodo.
Doug
2007-09-30 19:30:29 · answer #3 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, because how could the designer have been designed? It seems illogical to say that the universe had to be created, yet the creater was just always there.
2007-09-30 19:19:44 · answer #4 · answered by Chrissy 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You have been led astray by the words and concepts of others. Here is truth.
Chaos is energy and motion. Because it is disorganized, objects come into violent conflict and collision with each other resulting in destruction and change. Once things come to rest, lose their energy or are moving in paths that don’t bring them into conflict with each other then Order exists. Order is what is left after the destruction of Chaos. Perfect order then would be the complete lack of energy and motion.
If we equate Chaos with Evil because it is destructive and unpredictable then Evil has the victory over Good. Because of the nature of Evil it will feed on itself until it is self-destroyed. This gives the illusion of Good triumphing over Evil.
2007-09-30 19:28:18 · answer #5 · answered by international_bicycle_thief 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, but randomness does a pretty good job of mimicking design when you look at it in retrospect.
love and blessings Don
2007-09-30 19:09:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Throw three rocks on the table... Look! A triangle! Did you "design" that?
2007-09-30 19:26:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Heavens NO!
2007-09-30 19:47:42 · answer #8 · answered by Uncle Remus 54 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would have to be, right?
2007-09-30 19:09:05 · answer #9 · answered by Ben Reilly 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋