English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

I remember the game when Clemens started the other week against the Ravens. He figured out the NFL's most complex defense by the 4th quarter and nearly won a game for the Jets. I thought the Jets would be crazy not to make him the starter. Clemens could develop into a great QB if they would only give him a chance. Pennington used to be great, but isn't anymore because his constant injuries have destroyed his arm strength.

2007-09-30 11:44:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i might say so long to Chad and hi to Clemens. Pennington isn't an identical QB is as quickly as replaced into and he does not have the arm potential he as quickly as had so opposing communities do no longer understand the deep probability anymore and can jam the line of scrimmage with 8 or 9 adult adult males. they'd desire to get Clemens some enjoying time and a few journey. the quicker the greater perfect.

2016-10-10 01:50:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I do not think it would hurt the Jets cause any worse than it already is. Clemens would provide a better arm but his leadership would be questionable but you have to start somewhere and the future is where the Jets hopes will lie.

2007-09-30 11:33:46 · answer #3 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 0 0

its still going to be chad hes been a starter for awile

2007-09-30 11:32:53 · answer #4 · answered by FLASH 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers