Just look at their history and you will see that bloodlust is in the American psyche.
First the Indians got in their way so they commited a genocide (killing at LEAST 2 million).
Then the blacks got “uppity” and demanded equality so they lynched many thousands (the killers repeatedly acquitted by all white juries).
Now the Muslims are the targets of their hatred.
Thank goodness I’m not a Muslim - there is no limit to the bloodthirstiness of Americans.
2007-09-30 11:01:57 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The Americans didn't even care that the Muslims they were bombing in Iraq were not the ones who attacked on 9/11 - the joy of killing was satisfaction enough.
2007-09-30 11:02:19 · update #1
Your "facts" are more than slightly skewed. In the 20th century alone, the U.S. was usually the last to join in whichever fray was taking place. WW I, WW II, the war in Indo-China... Korea and Desert Storm/Iraqi Freedom found the U.S. defending the rights of the underdog -- those who were attacked. Note that Iraqi Freedom is intertwined with Desert Storm -- something to do with the U.N. cease fire agreement that ended D.S. not being upheld which was s delayed but direct lead in to Iraqi Freedom. Afghanistan could have been avoided had the Talibani government handed over the terrorists they were harboring who'd attacked the U.S..
As for the American Indians... That started long before there were "Americans." The Brit.s, French and Spaniards, mostly the latter, were "blood thirsty."
Funny, how you twist and pervert facts to try and cast an accusing finger at Americans. In so doing, you show the world your utter contempt and ignorance.
2007-09-30 11:15:39 · answer #1 · answered by Doc 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
freedom isn't free
2007-09-30 18:08:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
MONEY - POWER & CONTROL !
2014-11-24 17:17:40 · answer #3 · answered by wgac 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋