English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

also think the same about OJ Simpson?

2007-09-30 09:17:25 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

jam, do you not see the similarities? There is a good bit of evidence about the McCanns but they are doctors recently turned celebrities so they are getting off aswel!

2007-09-30 09:23:28 · update #1

lol, I'm the idiot? Im not the one who believes the bullsh*t the tapas 9 have comeout with since may 3rd!

for example. This is the "abductor": http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/04_03/EfitPortugalPA_468x574.jpg

2007-09-30 09:32:43 · update #2

cozy, thanks for the advice, would love to but I'm a girl...

2007-09-30 09:39:34 · update #3

Shambo, I think that is the longest answer you have ever given :)

2007-09-30 09:40:27 · update #4

37 answers

completely innocent?
hard to say - it depends on the charge
murder - really this is too awful to consider but neglect and possible manslaughter (if children were drugged to keep them asleep so parents could party) is within realms of credibility
i wondered at the time what they would expect toddlers and a young child to do if they were to wake up and find parents missing - well out of apartment anyway

i only know i don't like the way they behave now and all this fuss about not being able to say what they think....
i can't imagine what else they might have to say that their official or numerous family spokesmen haven't said

i was a little disappointed to note that my local church was having a fundraiser for them yesterday afternoon - haven't they raised enough?

as for OJ - this time the charges are robbery etc - guilty as charged

last time double murder - guilty as charged

the mccanns have learned much from people like OJ - having enough dosh to pay for the best legal team really can get you off with murder - and much lesser crimes too.

2007-09-30 10:03:58 · answer #1 · answered by Tequila.... 7 · 0 2

What I can say is there is not a atom of evidence saying they are guilty, IF I am wrong about this stop asking inane questions and provide the evidence.

You know you sound like a Portuguese cop, trying to associate innocent people like the McCanns with OJ Simpson is libel by implication. I think OJ was guilty the McCanns are innocent , get it?

2007-09-30 09:57:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

honestly i don't think that they had anything to do with the disappearance of the little girl but i think every one is missing the big picture.
how loving and caring is it for two doctor/ parents to leave their three children under the age of three on they own so that they can go and have so time on they own, how long does it take a child to get damage in which it can result in the cause of death1 min (not 30 mins)and if they wanted time on they own why didn't they leave the kids at home in england. the propose of a family holiday is that family go everywhere together and does it worth loosing a child than paying a few shity pounds, come on if it was anyone else they would be in jail for today. They need to be charge for they ridiculousness and inconsideration

2007-09-30 09:55:43 · answer #3 · answered by kolala 2 · 0 2

Totally different cases. Oh yes I'm sure they are loving a "celebrity status" (what planet are people on on?!). Do you really think they have chosen to swap the life of having a beautiful little girl for one of being hounded and accused by a bunch of headhunters, not knowing where their daughter is and missing her 24/7? People who are against them are just annoyed they left the children alone a hundred yards away and won't stop punishing them for it. What evidence proves that they had anything to do with it? It has been found that the police LIED that the hair was found in the boot when it was proved to be found in the rear seats and was the twins, so what else have they lied about? Why did the chief resign? I think you've stuck the knife in for long enough now don't you? Don't people realise that when I was a child in the 70's it was the norm for parents to leave the babies (yes babies) and toddlers alone in the chalet (Butlins) with only an intercom and it was safe? My parents and dozens others did. If the baby cried then reception would put a call out but people on here are behaving as if they were child beaters or something? They mistakenly thought she would be safe too and they were checked on every half hour. They are paying for their so called "mistake" now for the rest of their lives so enough now.

2007-09-30 09:43:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

Also out of pure curiosity, since you believe the McCanns murdered their baby, did you believe the same about Lindy Chamberlain ????

2007-09-30 20:58:33 · answer #5 · answered by Faith 6 · 1 0

The two are hardly the same. OJ was as guilty then as he is now, only this time, I don't think he's going to walk away scot free. The investigation of the Brown & Goldman murders was so badly botched by crooked, evidence-planting cops and inept, media-crazy prosecutors, to say nothing of a joke of a judge. Some of the country's best defense attorneys made them all look like the fools they were, but in so doing, got OJ out of a murder rap.

The inept and incapable Portugese police obviously have no experience in dealing with this, and since they can't figure out anything else, can only blame the victims, the parents. Coming up with DNA 3-4 months after the child disappeared shocked the world. They were so incapable, the DNA had to be sent to England for testing, only to find it was DNA of their twins, not the missing child. This is dumb beyond words.

2007-09-30 09:35:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 5

For Heavens' sake.OJ got off last time because all the jury were black racists and not because of good lawyers. His lawyers simply fanned the flames of racism.

The blacks are always complaining of racism against them, but when the power is in their hands they are the biggest racists of all. You poor white, Americans, drowning in political correctness and quilt. You ain't seen nothing yet.

2007-09-30 10:06:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The McCanns are guilty of negligence.......Nobody wants to think that they could have anything to do with Maddie going missing......it's to uncomfortable to think about. Personally I don't believe they had anything to do with it but the freedom of speech in this counrty has it's downside and newspapers survive on things like this because for some reason it makes us buy newspapers???........Portugese police????...........If it had happened in this counrty they would have been told after 21 days that Maddie was dead.................unless!!!!!!!!!...... there was a reason not too.???
OJ???? .....Don't care, just grateful that I don't live in a counrty with such a crap justice system........apparently Yank police are **** hot??? so who did kill his wife and boyfriend?????........Hav'nt seen any front page news of their pictures lately ???

2007-09-30 10:00:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Completely innocent? Definately they aint.
Be Vamp questioned your avatar and I thought I was the only one who noticed. Strange though, you seem to be back to your original on all of your questions now (past and present). Or is it just me?? xx

2007-10-01 08:52:37 · answer #9 · answered by Barney 3 · 0 0

That was funny. I nearly asked a similar question. I was wondering whether people who think they are completely innocent therefore agree with the McCanns having left three childen alone.

2007-09-30 09:35:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 4

fedest.com, questions and answers