I am new here but I have a few guesses.
I think that the trolls here are male college students and males in their 20s. They are not kids. They don't have much of a life and they usually don't have girlfriends. They think that they are clever by posting to GWS and getting women to respond. It gives them attention that they don't get in real life.
I think that most of the male supremacy people are mostly older men who are angry and frustrated because they are not happy or successful in their own lives and have failures in their relationships with women both as friends and sexually.
They link that in their minds and see women as good to hate on when they see women who clearly have better and happier and more interesting lives than they do. They are unhappy in their own lives and are jealous.
I think that the men who talk about beating and raping and terrorising women are probably adults. I don't know how many of them really do these things but I'm sure that many of then really want to.
I would be most concerned about the men who talk about it a lot or have long posts w/ details or harass and stalk women in here. I think they maybe are afraid of what will happen to them if they are arrested for really attacking women and see a place like this as a place where they can take out their anger w/o the consequences and can fantasise.
I totaly believe that they would do it for real if they thought they would not be caught.
2007-09-30 12:22:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ ~Sigy the Arctic Kitty~♥ 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
For the same reason religious people/homophobes troll around the LGBT forum, and for the same reason racist people troll around the Society and Culture forum.
Generally, they're bored and want a laugh.
Antimisandry-I'm pretty sure this guy is talking about the trolls that actually come here just to bash women, not necesarily the anti feminists. Don't even try to deny that there are trolls here.
2007-09-30 09:16:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
9⤊
0⤋
The decide (for one man or woman) might have a element yet maximum individuals push aside adult adult males hating females - they're, after all, idiots. On a distinctive element, we push aside people who're obssessive approximately color, do no longer we, as a results of fact there are 2 colours(,) and not one on my own. "Feminism", "Racism", "Sexism", they're words made up, from the hat of the magician. that's why i'm in favour of brushing off maximum previous posts and basically paying interest the two to mine or those which persist with mine. LOL.
2016-10-10 01:40:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They're bored, have high hostility levels, and get their jollies off bashing women. The majority aren't capable of a logical thought, so weren't not dealing with rocket scientists here. I feel sorry for a couple of them, they're truly pathetic.
2007-09-30 11:40:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by edith clarke 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
LOL @ anti
"Misogyny (hating women) and antifeminism are TWO different things entirely."
Wow I wish feminists deserved the same logic:
Misandry (Hating men) and feminism are TWO different things entirely
Just pointing out the irony Mr. anti-misandrist *ahem* typical antifeminist liar.
EDIT: ok sure, Tom Leykis, Warren Farrell, Rush Limbaugh, Allan Bloom, etc, etc, etc.
And the "mutant" argument has been refuted by nearly every feminist on this forum. Valarie Solanas was a psychopath, now, should I bulk Ted Bundy into my repartee? Nope! cause one psychopath does not represent an entire group's ideology.
2007-09-30 09:23:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Devil's Advocette 5
·
8⤊
3⤋
For the same reason people who hate makeup go to the beauty section to bash people, for the same reason people go to the science section to bash people who don't believe in creation theories. Some people are just that hateful and ignorant.
2007-09-30 09:19:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
11⤊
1⤋
I don't believe that it is any of the above. The reality is that this is a very interactive section....with arguments going back and forth all the time. The regulars are recognized by eachother - either positively or negatively - and you can be guaranteed a reaction to anything you post. So I would call it:
F) Because they know they can get a reaction or rise out of the women in this section
2007-09-30 09:18:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Super Ruper 6
·
5⤊
5⤋
E - for the ones who really bash
2007-09-30 09:14:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brat of Brats 4
·
7⤊
1⤋
You're performing a typical feminist lie.
Misogyny (hating women) and antifeminism are TWO different things entirely.
Restate your question with some truth and I'll consider answering it to the best of my ability for you.
ATE:
DA. Problem is, although I would agree if it were true - my experience with feminism is that it IS about female superiority (the Y gene is a 'mutated' X gene - thus female=whole, male=mutant), female unaccountability (Mary Winkler?) and bashing men (all men are rapists, 95% of abuses are done by men, etc. - those kinds of lies)... they serve to dehumanize men as a sex, not just the few bad apples.
2007-09-30 09:15:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
11⤋
amen!
2007-09-30 09:21:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋