English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-30 08:06:38 · 23 answers · asked by Nandi D 1 in Health Men's Health

23 answers

I haven't heard anything bad...........

2007-09-30 08:10:53 · answer #1 · answered by Greeneyes 6 · 1 4

Hey Andrew I just wanted to point out that circumcision is a hottly debated topic around the world. Both sides have "experts" and neither side is willing to try to see the point of view of the other. What I can tell you is that there are pro and cons to both ends of the spectrum. Another thing I can tell you is that I am circumcised... Now... if I were any more sensitive down there than I am already... I'd be making a mess of myself just walking down the street. Point is do not believe all the hype or the propaganda. Do you own research and find your own conclusion. If nothing else, as long as your plumbing works down there that's all that really matters. There is such a thing as foreskin restoration. But its not something I would take lightly either. If done improperly you could actually damage nerve endings and actually reduce physical senstation. If you try to restore your foreskin I would do so only under the supervision of a doctor. - my humble opinion.

2016-05-17 10:54:41 · answer #2 · answered by phoebe 3 · 0 0

Uncircumcised is the way God made you - every man is naturally born with a foreskin, meaning it must be there for many very important reasons.

With proper cleaning, there is no reason why an uncircumcised penis is at any greater risk to infections than a circumcised one. And any girl that lets such a factor influence her relationship with a guy is extremely shallow-minded.

Most men have gone their entire lives either being cut or uncut, therefore cannot give an accurate opinion or comparison of the other type.

So essentially it comes down to personal taste. You may prefer a circumcized penis, or you may not. However the most common criticism of the uncut penis is that it is unhygienic and unhealthy. But all thats required is to pull the foreskin back during your daily shower and wash. Easy as lifting your arm to wash your armpit.

Bear in mind that around 85% of the world's men are NOT circumcized. So no, it can't be a bad thing!

2007-09-30 09:17:50 · answer #3 · answered by Mike H 2 · 6 2

No, it's not bad at all.

I chose not to circumcise my son. They say you'll actually have more feeling in the head of the penis. It's a good thing!!!

2007-10-04 05:49:31 · answer #4 · answered by **Llola** 7 · 0 0

No, it's a good thing to not be circumcised! Luckily, most men in the world aren't! All the stuff about hygiene and diseases are all myths, and even if the are true, best prevented with water and condoms!

2007-09-30 16:57:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Surely if we were meant to be circumcised we would have evolved to have no foreskin. It's not a bad thing but in saying that neither is circumcision, it's personal (or religious) choice but I'm leaving mine intact.

2007-09-30 09:08:17 · answer #6 · answered by Harv S 3 · 7 1

No,not a bad thing.
It is a religious rite that has been carried on for centuries. The cutting off of a healthy body part. What doctor would do that (cut off a healthy body part)?
So too the wives tales regarding cleanliness. The excess skin protects the end which only protrubes on sexual stimulation which is what it was for. So unfolding that skin for washing and drying is all that is needed. No different than the care used in washing an ear, or around an eye.
Note that animals all have this protective covering over that part(dog,horse,whale).
It is a part of nature.
Proponents for it, don't know any different.
I still have my appendix and my wisdom teeth

2007-09-30 08:19:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

It is not a bad thing not be circumcised. There are basically no more problems uncircumcised then being circumcised, if the guy is hygienic and takes care of it.

2007-09-30 08:12:38 · answer #8 · answered by Merl 3 · 8 2

No. I am not circumcised and have no regrets. I think that nature cannot be out done. I am really happy that I was not circumcised. As far as infections I have not had any problems just normal hygiene.

2007-09-30 08:11:18 · answer #9 · answered by BOYD H 6 · 9 2

no it is not a bad thing to be uncut lot of us dudes are uncut and are leading happy and healthy lives. there is no more work to it than a cut unit. you take a shower each day you pull back on it and wash it with soap and water as you do with the rest of your body. there are advantage to having the extra skin for movement during intercourse. some dudes are cut tight and may need some lube to help things get going. there is the chick stereotype of EWWWW it is Dirty! but that is only cause most U.S . chicks have only seen cut units if they were in europe they would see more dudes like us and not be so freaked about it. We are the norm we are the way units were intended to be. I wouldnt get rid of mine.

curtdude
Uncut and happy

2007-09-30 09:58:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

I think its a bad thing to be circumcised. The foreskin is there are a reason. It keeps a man very sensitive right around the glans. And it's fun to play with.

2007-09-30 08:36:31 · answer #11 · answered by alterego 2 · 8 2

fedest.com, questions and answers