Americans think the other countries have crazy people for leaders but history has shown that only the United States has ever used a nuclear device on another. Hypocrites!
2007-09-30 07:38:30 · 23 answers · asked by trer 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I didn't say America is the only country with nukes, I said Americans are the only people who think that they are the only ones who SHOULD have nukes. LEARN TO READ.
2007-09-30 08:04:58 · update #1
actually, i think it's learn to interpret with common sense. :D
personally, i think it's because most Americans think their so high and mighty and that they area always helping other people, like the U.S. is baby-sitting all the other countries.
in fact, it should be the other way around, our country is only about two hundred years old; basically all the middle eastern countries are THOUSANDS of years old, we have no right to complain.
2007-09-30 13:26:49 · answer #1 · answered by Rose du fantôme 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million. All monopolies, % to maintain status quo. 2. it is not so ordinary as international places having specific histories. it is touching directly to the international acknowledging and having faith interior the methods in place interior the country, for duty, stability (of government, ideology, adulthood and the midsection course. Credentials are what count huge type. Threats to the methods subtract your factors. 3. economic might. 4. historic previous of the country for determining on balanced (centrist) governments. Revolutions truly convey this quotient down. top-wing governments additionally upload on. 5. How substantial are the produced uncooked aspects to the superpowers. usually conversing, black-oil is in simple terms too effectual for the international powers, and hence they could pass all out to be sure some type of administration over a similar. This ingredient will become extra substantial and effectual if the aspects listed above are actually not being addressed properly. No u . s . nicely worth that is skill, could enable that is fodder to be decrease off. 6. The leaders. Naive and robust worded reactions (no longer commensurate with the status) truly can upload directly to the negatives. China could have the money for to make significantly better statements then Iran. they are going to be distrusted, yet heavily isn't performed with. If Iran can attain that time, the tale would be very distinctive. 7. Iranian leaders would be a lot wiser in the event that they understand that the cart must be placed at the back of the pony, ie, first strengthen as a economically, politically, socially, diplomatically and ideologically mature u . s ., then issues would be very distinctive. See India.
2016-10-20 09:28:09 · answer #2 · answered by borgmeyer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What gives you that idea? England, Russia, France, Israel, China, India, Pakistan also have them. We don't really want any more because the more countries that have them the more likely it is that they'll be used. We were justified in using them on Japan. We were in a fight to the finish and we did (and were justified) every thing possible to make sure we were the victors and not Japan. Ever studied what the Japanese were up to during the lead in to WWII? Ever hear of the rape of Nanking? The enslavement of a large part of Asia? What do you think would have happened here if they had won? Do you really think they would have rebuilt our country? We are the only country in history to rebuild countries we've vanquished. We don't take their land. Japan and Germany are intact today. As is Italy, and several other countries we had every right to take over and control. As somebody said, to the victor goes the spoils. We seem to keep giving them back. You either don't understand America or you hate it. Why are you still here? Maybe you should go somewhere where they refuse to defend themselves and they aren't such hypocrites. Moron.
2007-09-30 07:56:45 · answer #3 · answered by rick b 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes, they are hypocrites, and I agree with you completely. Even though Other countries have nuclear technology, I have never seen them use it. And then, Americans complain about other countries having it when the GAVE India nuclear technology in exchange for Mangoes. Great trade Americans.
2007-09-30 08:04:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The US has never said we should be the only ones allowed to have nuclear weapons. We have a policy of us, along with our trusted allies, to have them and those we consider rivals shouldn't. Unfortunately some who are friends one day may be enemies another and visa versa. With countries at odds with each other having them it assures fear of mutual destruction and a balance of power that seems to keep us from getting into major wars.
2007-09-30 07:51:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Several other countries have nuclear weapons and are very responsible in their handling of those weapons. Its those countries that would like to have the weapons and go around spouting that they want to wipe this country off the map or these people off the face of the earth that worry me. Those are the countries that should not have any access to any type of nuclear anything. I take it you are anti-American? Yea, I thought so.
2007-09-30 07:51:39 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
How many times does this question have to be asked and disproven?
America is not the only country without Nukes.
Russia, China, Great Britain, Israel, Pakistan, North Korea, Germany, France and many other countries have nuclear weapon.
The UN security council doesn't want crazy people who have no reguard for human life to have them.
That is why they are trying to negotiate North Korea to give up their and refuse to let Iran have them.
2007-09-30 07:44:43 · answer #7 · answered by WCSteel 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Nukes are leverage for public policy, notice U.S does not got to war with nuclear nations
2007-09-30 07:42:35 · answer #8 · answered by Gator 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Dumb Question ! Have you ever heard of these other "little" countries that have Nukes ? Russia, China, France, Great Britain, India, Pakistan, Israel??
Get a clue, try reading a book !
2007-09-30 07:59:17 · answer #9 · answered by thehermanator2003 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Beats me, Hon. I'm no more frightened by the prospect of A-Jad having nukes than I am by the fact that Bush has access to them. The thought of "Itchy-Fingers" Bush with his thumb on the button scares the h-e-double-hockey-sticks outta me.
And no, nuking Japan---TWICE---wasn't the right thing to do, especially in the case of Nagasaki. Japan was hardly given sufficient time to surrender following the destruction of Hiroshima, and it had no military significance whatsoever. I'm so tired of people who blindly believe that the good ol' U.S. of A. can do no wrong...sigh.
Edit: WCsteel---are you implying that everyone of those countries you named DOES have regard for human life?---particulary Israel, China and Russia?
2007-09-30 07:48:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋