English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-30 07:10:19 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

WoW NONE of you can answer this question, I wonder why that is

2007-09-30 07:15:25 · update #1

29 answers

I do not agree with his policies, and I do not think he should be in ANY public office, but I cannot think of any laws that have been broken.

2007-09-30 07:15:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 8

How about stealing the 2000 election for starts?
Beyond that we will know more when subpeoned documents concerning DOJ involvement in election fraud, and the politicizing of the Justice dept come to light.
His utter disregard for the limits of the power of the executive branch and his un constitutional expansion of executive priveledge are impeachable. There is indication that the policy of torture and rendition began with the Bush White House as well as the war crime that is Iraq.
His use of signing statements is also illeagel.

2007-09-30 08:24:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

At the very least dereliction of duty!
The FBI office in Minneapolis had Moussaoui in custody for weeks before 9/11!FBI HQ in Washington denied requested FISA warrants obstructing terrorism investigations why?
Bush received the 8/6/01 stating "Bin Laden determined to strike in US"!

What orders did Bush give concerning counter-terrorism after receiving that PBD????

2007-09-30 07:22:00 · answer #3 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 6 2

Deception of Congress and the American Public
Committing a Fraud Against the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371)
Making False Statements Against the United States (18 U.S.C. § 1001)

War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93-148)
Misuse of Government Funds (31 U.S.C. § 1301)
Improper Detention, Torture, and Other Inhumane Treatment
Anti-Torture Statute (18 U.S.C. § 2340-40A)
The War Crimes Act (18 U.S.C. § 2441)
The Geneva Conventions and Hague Convention: International Laws Governing the Treatment of Detainees
United Nations Convention Against Torture, and Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment: International Laws Governing the Treatment of Detainees
Command Responsibility (for known illegal acts of subordinates in the military)
Detainment of Material Witnesses (18 U.S.C. § 3144)
Retaliating against Witnesses and Other Individuals
Obstruction Congress (18 U.S.C. § 1505)
Whistleblower Protection (5 U.S.C. § 2302)
The Lloyd-LaFollette Act, or "anti-gag rule" (5 U.S.C. § 7211)
Retaliating against Witnesses (18 U.S.C. § 1513)
Leaking and other Misuse of Intelligence and other Government Information
Revealing Classified Information in Contravention of Federal Regulations (Executive Order 12958/Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement)
Statutory Prohibitions on Leaking Information (18 U.S.C. § 641, etc.)
Laws Governing Electronic Surveillance
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (50 U.S.C. § 1801, et seq.)
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. chapter 15)
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. § 222)
Stored Communications Act of 1986 (18 U.S.C. § 2702)
Pen Registers or Trap and Trace Devices (18 U.S.C. § 3121)
Laws and Guidelines Prohibiting Conflicts of Interest (28 U.S.C. § 528, etc.)

Just for starters.

2007-09-30 07:35:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

thats where the microscope and paperwork come into play -- I think its like 86% of crimes take place by means of pen and paper -- I don't have the source to back that up -- too bad, huh?

2007-09-30 07:37:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 3 0

which
'great'
president?
Bush Sr or
Bush Jr
I wasn't old enough to vote for Sr. and did not vote for Bush Jr. So I have no 'great president'.

Bush Jr. however is a war criminal. He is still a war criminal. He will always be a war criminal.
People that "stand by" the president are people who refuse to face the truth.
I can see why they do however, because no one really wants to put down their own leader. Especially when they mistakenly believe that people from other countries give a rats behind. Because other countries don't really care what WE think.
They have their own minds.
They don't need to feed off of ours.


oh please questioner!!!!
Henry VII gave you the answers. as did Sagacious. It's too bad you aren't familiar with the law. Or perhaps it is because you aren't familiar with the fact that there are laws to begin with.

stop being silly and face the truth.

2007-09-30 07:13:47 · answer #6 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 6 7

Are there any? Of course, with so many laws on the books, it really is impossible not to break a law...

2007-09-30 07:15:57 · answer #7 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 3 2

He has lied to the people. He is not an honest president. He has killed inocent people just for the sake of killing and oil.

2007-09-30 08:20:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

None.

2007-09-30 16:47:48 · answer #9 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 1 1

I think you should plural that question cause he's broke more than one.

Hey bush lovers he's giving money to terrorists. $25 million to a country he labeled an axis of evil. Try supporting America for once will ya.

2007-09-30 07:14:13 · answer #10 · answered by MyMysteryId 3 · 7 5

-- Ten Reasons to Impeach George Bush and Dick Cheney
http://www.democrats.com/peoplesemailnetwork/88
-- Contains a complete list of offenses. Charges explicitly citing statutes and laws are listed below:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/010607D.shtml

I. FAILURE TO ENSURE THE LAWS ARE FAITHFULLY EXECUTED
Under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States of America, the President has a duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."
(1) Self-Exemption From Laws Upon Signing.
(2) Suspension of Basic Legal Proceedings.
(3) Promoting Illegal War
In direct violation of Articles 41 and 42 of the United Nations Charter, a treaty ratified by the United States Senate in 1945 and therefore the supreme law of the land as according to Article VI of the Constitution.
(4) Promoting Torture.
In direct violation of, and as part of a pattern of consistent attempts through executive orders, legal memoranda and alterations to regulations such as the Army Field Manual, to undermine the Federal Torture Statute [18 USC Sec. 2340A];
"The Third Geneva Convention banning torture and abuse of Prisoners of War, as well as non-combatants and unarmed ("enemy") combatants held in detention; and Articles 4 and 32 of the Fourth Geneva Convention... these declarations and treaties being ratified by the United States Senate and therefore the supreme law of the land as according to Article VI of the Constitution"
(5) Promoting Kidnappings and Renditions for Torture.
In direct violation of the United Nations Convention Against Torture, Article 3, and the Fourth Geneva Convention, Articles 31 and 45, the said conventions having been ratified by the United States Senate and therefore the supreme law of the land as according to Article VI of the Constitution.
(6) Use of Illegal Weapons.

II. ABUSE OF OFFICE AND OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
(1) Obstructing Inquiry and Detection.
(2) Replacing the Veto With Signing Statements.

III. FAILURE TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION
(1) Suspension of Due Process.
Violation of rights of habeas corpus and Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights
(2) Unreasonable Searches and Seizures.
Violation of Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights
-- Non-Cooperation with Congress:
In derogation of the legislative functions of the Congress, granted under Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution.
(3) Non-Cooperation With Congress.
(4) Establishment of an Unconstitutional, Parallel Legal System

2007-09-30 07:17:56 · answer #11 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 10 5

fedest.com, questions and answers