I dont trust any of them, i think all are corrupt
2007-09-30 06:53:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Boston George 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
The set-up of your question is illogical but I'll try to answer anyway. I most definitely don’t trust Bush. I don’t trust Petraeus and Lieberman. Bill Clinton has said that the Iraq war was “a big mistake” so I agree with his characterization of the war.
Soros, Sheehan and Moveon.org. are correct in stating that the war was illegal. I don’t care what Al Qaeda and Hamas think.
2007-09-30 14:08:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by tribeca_belle 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Again, this is typical of the way the right argues. To begin with are given a false choice between arguably "mainstream" individuals and organizations and organizations which tend to use inflammatory rhetoric to get their points across (this is setting aside the completely unfair and vicious equation of Al Qaida and these individuals, which is beneath both contempt and comment). There are plenty of sources, such as the non-partisan General Accounting Office of the United States, which have issued severe critisim of the "facts" put forth in this last round of justification for the war, and the misrepresentations and outright lies which suckered people into voting to go to war in the first place are very well documented by several mainstream news organizations both in the United States and in Europe.
I defy you to find any firm statement by Bill Clinton supporting the Iraq War once the terrible misstatements and lies of this administration came to light in early 2005, by the way.
2007-09-30 14:04:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Faustus 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Here's Major General Eaton, "father of the new Iraqi army", back from Iraq, and loves America
http://youtube.com/watch?v=tw4jSZLkJqA
of course we are glad that we took out Saddam Hussein
but the rationalization for war was completely flawed and incorrect
George Soros supported George W. Bush in the 2000 election.
Do you trust the other nations of the world (not just France; Germany and Russia too), which carefully reviewed intelligence before the war and said, flat-out, that we were wrong?
Do you trust General Petraeus, who could not come up with any way the war is helping America, and his boss Admiral Fallon, who is against the troop surge?
Do you trust George W. Bush, who landed on an aircraft carrier in 2003 and declared "in the battle of Iraq, America and its allies have prevailed!" and then "bring it on" when insurgents began to kill our soldiers?
Do you trust the media, which warns you about Iran when the MAJORITY (over 50%) of insurgents in Iraq are from US ally Saudi Arabia??
2007-09-30 14:00:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by MrPotatoHead 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
The same reason Woodrow Wilson let 1. 5 million Christian Armenians did at the hands of the Turks. To keep their money and investments there.
The same reason FDR let millions of Jews handy capped and other die before getting into WW II.
The lib's or as they like to claim progressive code for Communist will do any thing to sell out for power and get in bed with any one to reach this evil act.
Which makes them evil and traitors to the USA and they need to be dealt with now and we need real people with gohunies on the right.
2007-09-30 14:51:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
why do Conscum always simplify issues into untruths? is it to sway opinion toward their distorted and dishonest viewpoint?-
how many four-star generals did Duh-bya fire (including Colin Powell) until he came across the current stooge that fits right into his agenda?
how long ago was Colin Powell taking issue with our continued presence in Iraq?
Oh my God - are the GOPigs so desperately grasping at straws now that they're name dropping Bill Clinton to try to get support for their cause
ROtheFFLMfA$$O
2007-09-30 14:10:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well I sure don't trust Bush!
He ignored our national security and terrorism until after we were attacked!
How could the FBI have the 20th hijacker in custody for two weeks before 9/11 and not foil the plot!
2007-09-30 14:01:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by honestamerican 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
hmm so your question is...."do we trust the guy who thought terrorists were the biggest threat to national security prior to 9/11/2001, or the guy who thought Saddam hussein was?"....hmmm i guess I'll have to go with the guy who warned Bush that Osama and his organization of terrorists were....Bill Clinton, ya know since saddam never did attack us. You know the same guy who tried to tap the phone line prior to 9/11, but your type was against it and had it declared unconsitutional, along with trimming his airline security proposals.
You people remind me of British loyalist, that would always remain loyal to the crown, not because the government was right, but because the king saying so, made it right. In our case it is a case of choosing between loyalty to Bush party politics, or loyalty to America. We see where you stand.
2007-09-30 13:56:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
A hydrogen molecule has more credibility than GW Bush.
Bush's incompetence is astounding to say the least. How can anyone trust a president that lied to start the war in the first place?
2007-09-30 13:54:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
7⤊
3⤋
I love how moveon.org and Sheehan are in the same group as Al-Qaeda.
I mean you don't have to agree with them to realize that is a little bit extreme. I suppose you believe anti-war politicians are America haters and terrorists too?
2007-09-30 13:57:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by cheezbawl2003 4
·
5⤊
3⤋
I trust that it should have never come to this. Saddam had it all under control. He was our lap dog. Now look at all of the Americans that have died. The entire Arab species is not worth the life of one God Blessed American.
2007-09-30 13:57:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Sloan R 5
·
2⤊
2⤋