Westbrook would obviously be the better choice but hes a game time decision in a night game. i have just over 1 hour to decide
2007-09-30 04:34:09 · 5 answers · asked by xombieslayer 3 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Westbrook all the way.
2007-09-30 04:41:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have grabbed Buckhalter if he was available and then put him in if Westbrook was a late scratch. I've had Westbrook for the last 2 years and he is always listed questionable and usually plays. I did get burned once when he was a late scratch on a Monday night game. I'd take the risk with Westbrook. I have watson in for R. Johnson in one of my leagues, but I'm not expecting much from him against a very good Pats run defense.
2007-09-30 11:38:45 · answer #2 · answered by cmcatena 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would still start him. He has way more fantasy points than Watson does. Even if he doesn't play for very long, he's still probably going to get you more points than Watson will. There is a guy in my league who has him on his team, and he's starting him this week too. He has an abdomen injury, but I doubt it's going to hinder his performance much. Good luck with your decision making.
2007-09-30 11:47:07 · answer #3 · answered by daitheflu99 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This has got to better the stupidest question. I don't care if Brian Westbrook broke his freakin' neck! You should not play Kenny Watson over him(Larry Johnson yes, L.T. yes, Addai yes, Maroney maybe, MBIII or JJ maybe...but not Kenny Watson!)
2007-09-30 11:47:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gale Sayers is better
2007-09-30 11:37:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋