The comparative "farther" is different because it goes back to a different root. It is a variant of "further" (the form itself influenced by the word "far"), which apparently is related to the word "forth".
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=further
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=forth
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=far
2007-09-30 16:08:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by bruhaha 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the same reason that we don't say, "firth" for first and "fourst" for fourth...It doesn't resonate well in the nasal cavity and would take two lifetimes to get accustomed-to.
2007-09-30 12:09:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Beejee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's how the language has developed. I do hope they don't change it, I'd have to learn to spell again. Judging by some stuff I see typed on here, (not yours), they have changed it all.
2007-09-30 11:58:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
its in the latin or the roots of a language
2007-09-30 13:31:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Grand Phuba 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do and far rest and near the rest
2007-09-30 11:17:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋