Look at all the good thats come from his administration....perfection, plain and simple.
He's apposed to abortion (murder which in the past year killed thousands more than the war in Iraq), he's made more americans go back to work when capable, he supports the poor, he supports single parent families, cares about minorities, the list goes on and on.
I wish he could run for many more terms!
2007-09-30 03:31:55 · 25 answers · asked by The prophet of DOOM 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not to mention he's got the best looking and most intelligent first lady since Jackie O.
2007-09-30 03:33:07 · update #1
Be honest and say whats on your mind. Pull no punches!
2007-09-30 03:34:03 · update #2
Not only what you have said but, he cut taxes thus creating even more jobs. Unemployment is at it's lowest except for Blue states that continue to raise taxes. Michigan should be an example to those non-believers.
The stock market, despite the shock to our economy with 9/11, has rebounded, and more Americans than ever are participating in the stock market.
He increased the military that Clinton had emasculated. He has increased security and continues to do so. He untied the hands of the FBI and the CIA. I am grateful we haven't had any further terrorist attacks here!
I don't want to hear that Bush is a liar either, If he lied, he could have done a cover up like Clinton. Instead he was up front and told people there were we no weapons of mass destruction found. And if he was truly in Iraq for "oil," then why hasn't he seized the oil fields?
He truly is a good man and a great president!
And the beat goes on..........
2007-09-30 05:48:59 · answer #1 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I agree, one of the best if not THE best president this country has had. Imagine if you had Clinton, Kerry, Edwards or any of that ilk taking office, as Bush did, when the economy was in total free fall.
Then, as soon as you righted the economic mess that Slick Willie left you, suddenly the Al Qaida cells that started and finished their training during Slick Willie's term unleashed their psychotic havoc on the country on 9-11.
Then you invade a nation to depose a dictator, thinking that it must be ok to do that because Slick Willie did it to Slobodan Milosevic and not even one liberal put on sandals to march against war, and suddenly the opposing party has a ready made platform to stand on.
I thank God every day for putting this man in office. Al Gore? John Kerry? puh-LEASE!
2007-09-30 10:55:27 · answer #2 · answered by dagiffy 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Actually, the number of abortions has'nt changed appreciably in about 10 years. The difference is the funding from the federal government. What has changed is that he is against stem cell research which could/would cure Alzheimers, Type ONe Diabetes, Parkinsons and many other international diseases. But since he doesn't support this I guess you could call him "anti-life', considering that people would live by SCR. Also he is guilty of murder, and if you thin otherwise, you simply are not paying attention. Abortion is not murder. Period. ANd do you really want a dumb *** male Texan telling you what you can and can't do with your own body? Supports the poor? He just cut the funding for transportation and food and health care for disabled school children. That is like saying the repubs are for "family values" while Larry Craig, Mark Foley and Viter, Ted Stevens and Dan Young are out chasing underage boys for sex. So if this is the kind of guy you like to running your country, at the very least, you should be serving in Iraq. ANd then when your face gets blown off by a roadside bomb, or your legs, or your nuts, etc, tell us how much you support this bozo, and what you think you are fighting for. Because in 10 years, when you are still disabled and can't do - - - -, we will have all forgotten about Iraq and you fighting against "terrorism".
2007-09-30 10:45:15 · answer #3 · answered by commonsense 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋
That's not saying much when you look at the competition.
Ford just died, we've got Carter & Clinton who couldn't find their azz with both hands, then ya got Bush Sr. who was ok but kinda rode on the coat tails of Reagan, so yeah, he's the best living example.
As far as first lady's go, ... no comment.
2007-09-30 19:49:12 · answer #4 · answered by Zipperhead 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he really isn't. He definitely isn't the worst, though(*cough* FDR). He's good on national security but pretty pathetic on immigration, and pretty good with the economy but to my mind lame on domestic policy otherwise. He has the big things down but the fiddlies prevent him from being as good as he could be. I'm a little wary of anyone so much as running for more than the Constitutional limit set on Presidential terms: no single person is so important, no crisis so tremendous, that such a scenario would be justified. In fact, far from good intentions, I would say that seeking a third term or beyond is nothing more than simple lust for power: running the most powerful country in the world has got to get to you at some point. Once it does (and it would for anyone, given sufficient time), that person is to my mind no longer fit to serve the people, having diverted his attention to serving his own interests. (That's part of the reason I really don't like FDR.)
2007-09-30 10:45:20 · answer #5 · answered by Richard S 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Not really. Even if he stabilizes Iraq the U.S. still loses in the long run. Being the world's global policeman while racking up huge government and trade deficits is not sustainable. U.S. foreign commitments were over extended before Bush came to power. He has made it far worse. At some point the U.S. must come home. To keep putting it off will only make it worse.
2007-09-30 11:35:22 · answer #6 · answered by yankeecomehome 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I believe he is, yes. He doesn't give off that Ronald Reagan image he was predicted to, but that's okay, because he isn't Ronald Reagan.
I do however, question him on his not trying harder to get rid of illegals, and also not pardoning the 2 border patrol agents who shot that stinking illegal alien drug dealer in his buns!
2007-09-30 11:49:48 · answer #7 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Har de har har har, you are a wag aren't you? just when the day was looking grim we get a clown on the site who will make us all laugh our socks off. So my friend, you have made us laugh, now what is the real reason why you have written in? is it to tell us that you are now on/off the medication that the doctors prescribed for you? or is it some other sinister reason, NO !! I have it, YOU are George W. Bush and you are just trying to drum up a little support for the lost cause, er... Tony Blair didn't write this little fictional work of genius for you did he? no, on second thoughts he isnt that clever.
2007-09-30 11:52:09 · answer #8 · answered by Lord Percy Fawcette-Smythe. 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
History will reveal him to be one of the greatest to have ever served this country!
2007-09-30 16:45:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is a time for war and a time for peace...war was inevitable. Would you want war on our turf instead of Iraq?
Abortion is wrong...it's not the child's fault that he/she was conceived, yet it is a choice for the mother to just kill an innocent child?
I think President Bush has been a wonderful president, but there will be plenty of people who will disagree. I'm just glad we didn't have Kerry or Ghor as president...they'd try to negotiate with the terrorists. I just hope that we don't end up with Hillary the Horrid next election! Sure, it would be nice to have a woman president, but HER?
2007-09-30 10:38:39 · answer #10 · answered by futureteacher0613 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋