what do you think leave your views
2007-09-30 01:19:51 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
there was proof that the driver was not drunbk. and people who were there at the scene said that when they put her in ambulance she said she was fine. rumor is that she was killed in the ambulance.
2007-09-30 01:27:32 · update #1
MURDER.
A brief summary of the known evidence is as follows.
The unscheduled journey through the symbolic Pont de L'Alma tunnel (an ancient Pagan sacrificial site) took Diana and her boyfriend Dodi Al Fayed AWAY FROM their intended destination, Dodi's flat.
Just before the car entered the tunnel every police radio in Paris mysteriously died, preventing a quick response which could have saved Diana's life.
Just before the car entered the tunnel every security camera in the tunnel mysteriously died, preventing us from ever seeing footage of what caused the crash.
The crime scene was completely cleaned within hours of the crash, a policy totally anathema to standard preservation of any crime scene.
Diana was still alive after the crash. Unexplained delays in getting her to the hospital, caused by the slow speed of the ambulance and the fact that it passed several nearer hospitals before reaching its destination, ensured Diana was dead upon arrival. A faster response could have saved her life.
The foremost reason put forward to explain the 'accident' - that driver Henri Paul was dangerously drunk, has been thoroughly debunked by the camera footage of his behavior before the crash and the fact that the tests on Paul's blood were either faked or swapped with the blood of another dead man. Paul's liver showed no sign of alcohol abuse and his close friends and family said he rarely drank alcohol.
Multiple eyewitnesses reported a mysterious flash of light immediately before the crash. Many insist that this was a laser directed at the driver to cause temporary blindness leading to the crash.
The initial French investigation into the crash went to every length to ignore key evidence, intimidate eyewitnesses into silence and outright fabricate evidence
Diana was killed because she was pregnant with Dodi's child and the British Royal Family didn't want an Arab in their sacred bloodline. Diana was also becoming politically involved in the Middle East and the elite saw her as a loose cannon that could rally popular support around anything. Diana herself remarked to reporters that there would be 'a big surprise' from her a few days before her death.
Lord Steven's previous enquiry into Irish Republican Army terrorism unearthed links to British intelligence but seemed to disappear down the memory hole. Our hope is that the inquiry will have some genuine consequences for the criminals who assassinated 'England's Rose' and that it will prevent them from engaging in similar political hits in the future.
2007-09-30 01:41:18 · answer #1 · answered by Bo 3 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Murder. Fayed's father believes the same thing. Just think: The mother of the future King of England married to a Muslim. Uh uh. No way. Medical treatment was deliberately withheld long enough to allow Diana to die, although she might have been helpd along to her death even sooner. Royals have commited politically expedient murders for centuries for the sake of the monarchy.
Jack the Ripper was Sir William Gull, physician to Queen Victoria, and a Freemason. The murders were all done according to Masonic law and according to the story, Price Albert Victor, grandson of Victoria, hung out with Bohemians in tawdry setcions of London and wound up with a prostitute whom he married and had a child by. Five other prossies were witnesses to the union and all were murdered in the JTR case. The Royal wife was taken to an asylum and given a lobotomy. The child was imprisoned in the asylum and died in her teens.
Prince Albert died from an STD which affected his brain.
All was done to preserve the monarchy...and all records at Scotland Yard destroyed.
2007-09-30 11:00:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was a tragic accident. Why would anyone want to murder her? It's not like she was having an affair with Dodi outside her marriage. Prince Charles was the one who was carrying on his secret affair with Camilla throughout his entire marriage.
The Queen obviously would do no such thing. She has no reason to murder Princess Diana, if she wanted to protect the "royal family" by seeking revenge she would have also murder Sarah Duchess of York and Mark Phillips. Both of whom were also convicted of infidelity throughout their marriages.
As for the rumor of her being pregnant at the time, why would the unborn baby be such a threat to anyone? It's not like the child is going to shake the foundation of the British monarchy.
2007-09-30 02:47:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Murder
2007-09-30 04:33:24 · answer #4 · answered by dlil 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I believe it was a tragic, avoidable accident. I will add though, I'm not convinced we have all the facts. Diana will always be remembered and missed.
2016-05-17 08:23:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you ever read a real newspaper? Or a news magazine? Or watch a legit tv network news show?
The driver was drunk. And was seen drinking that night.
Diana and Dodi were not heading to his flat - they were going to a mysterious meeting that had been cancelled earlier in the evening.
They didn't follow normal security procedures, and went against his father's wishes.
They were driving at high speed through the streets of Paris and she wasn't wearing a seatbelt. The doctor who treated her on the scene confirms she said nothing, and died from the massive internal injuries.
Diana - who contrary to what a previous poster wrote was Princess Dianna, aka Diana, Princes of Wales (she was born Lady Diana but elevated on her marriage to Prince Charles) - was not pregnant with Dodi's baby. As I have written before, they only met two weeks before the accident. Prior to that Dodi's father was trying to have a relationship with Diana. When he realized that wouldn't pan out, he brought in his son.
There is now suggestions that Dodi, not Diana, was the target of a murder attempt. It has been suggested by responsible media that former arms-dealing colleagues of Dodi's father, who feel they were double-crossed by him, went after the son as a way to get back at the father. The suggestion is that the father uses the Diana "murder" charge to deflect attention from him.
2007-09-30 04:08:23 · answer #6 · answered by brian s 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Murdered..tho I'm sure the truth will come to light say in another 50 or 60 yrs time when some old dusty documents are accidently discovered, by that time..im sure the generation of that time wont have a clue who she was.
2007-09-30 02:51:24 · answer #7 · answered by London_Girl 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm sure 200 years from now, this question will still be asked and there will continue to be no answer.
2007-09-30 07:53:59 · answer #8 · answered by christie_crizy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Murder,,but Dodi was the one they were trying to bump off
2007-09-30 05:22:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Many people considered she was murdered. But as far as I know everybody loved her , so why would people wanted this to happen?
2007-09-30 01:26:05 · answer #10 · answered by Tymeea 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋