English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Blindfolded too? That's when it matters.

2007-09-30 01:11:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's probably more comfortable in the front. But if the person being handcuffed is aggressive, it's probably safer for the person doing the handcuffing (ie a police officer) if the individual is handcuffed in the back.

2007-09-30 01:07:54 · answer #2 · answered by Amanda 7 · 0 0

behind the back would be for a criminal that would potentially try to resist, if it would be necessary.
in front, would be as to respect the rule if it must be handcuffed, it could be more politely.
I'm a civil citizen.
I would think if the suspect is cooperative, then lesser force will be needed. If the situation has confirmed to be under control, no potential hazard could come up, then the officer could calm down and take control of the situation fast and possibly more gently, it would be important for the officer to determine which it is, to have critically decisions making of the situation.

2007-09-30 01:10:06 · answer #3 · answered by - 3 · 0 0

In terms of comfort and convenience? Being handcuffed in front is far more comfortable, you have better mobility and the ability to rest in a variety of positions, and you can be autonomous to a degree (like eating, writing, peeing, etc.).

If you are talking about rendering a prisoner less threatening, handcuffing in the back is better.

2007-09-30 01:07:35 · answer #4 · answered by Buttercup 6 · 0 0

for total security people are sometimes handcuffed to a tight chain around their abdomen which prohibits them from jumping through the cuffs..but to answer your question if i had to be handcuffed i'd prefer the front, because i don't think it would be very comfortable if i had to ride in a squad car handcuffed behind my back. hopefully if i keep my nose clean i won't experience any of it...

2007-09-30 01:10:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have never been handcuffed, but I would choose the front.

2007-09-30 01:06:29 · answer #6 · answered by barbwire 7 · 0 0

It depends on whose doing the handcuffing

2007-09-30 01:05:53 · answer #7 · answered by Troy K 3 · 0 0

When you are arrested,the handcuffs are put behind your back. It's uncomfortable especially when sitting down. Been there. You're less likely to be aggressive . If they are in front, you can still hit someone

2007-09-30 06:06:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Doesn't matter. If it's in back, I'll just jump over the handcuffs to get them in front. Ever seen that done? It looks pretty impressive, but it's not that hard to do, if you're flexible.

2007-09-30 01:06:10 · answer #9 · answered by 42ITUS™ 7 · 0 0

this isnt one of those experiences i think about i wouldnt want to be handcuffed

2007-09-30 01:06:23 · answer #10 · answered by ladyluck 6 · 0 0

Err...I don't think many have been handcuffed

2007-09-30 01:06:49 · answer #11 · answered by Political Sigmund Freud 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers