no, they should simply vote conservative and understand that there is no such thing as a free lunch contrary to the liberal pap so prevelant here.
2007-09-30 00:14:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Kwitcherbellyakin! That fact that you even use the term "Class" indicates that you are dumber than parking lot gravel.
You couldn't do any better at forming a government than what we have right now.
If you haven't noticed, we are a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Our government may be corrupt but that is just a mirror of corrupt citizens. Take some thieving Union thug for example, they will almost always vote Democrat, because they know they get a personal economic benefit from a Democrat. That's a corrupt citizen, welfare recipients are just the same and so is Tort Attorneys. Richard Nixon was an Angel compared to most citizens.
If you want to revolt, go ahead, all the institutions that benefit you will fall, chaos will reign and our experiment in democracy will fail.
This is America, we don't have "Classes". You can be any Class you want to be.
2007-09-30 08:15:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
well let me tell the guy with "classes' as issue. Its time you go to class and realize that many americans dont put the words "government institutions" and "benifits" in the sentence together. Doubt you can slide your funky *** into my neigborhood without becoming a crime victim there "Peckerwood" Yeah my friend, It's sad to think how many still hold to the idea that voting, or life qualities would be far worse if we were to unite as poor americans. The truth is, the only lives to see significant change would be the greediest of the greedy and the most ruthless of criminals. the quality changes could only get better for the nations prisoners, there for lack of money to buy fairness , and for those going to work to pay the cost administrations, or for the dope dealers who do so for lack of any other options,and for the addicts who would have no need to use drugs to drowned out the realities of all the above conditions around them. Lock and LOAD lets roll
2007-09-30 08:48:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by rick s 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes,the Founders would not put up with how their 'experiment'
has been co-opted by the self-serving politiciains and mega corporations.They were wary of "foreign" influences and
alliances and understood that COMMERCE was the path to take when dealing with foreign nations,not military pacts or attempts to 'change' a government that was not as theirs was.
I think it is too late to 'revolt' by use of armed force and the reason is that the Americans of 2007 do not possess the
character of the Colonials and could not perform the very grisly,very real,consequences that defeating tyranny ensues.
Our nation has never succeeded at exporting our Revolution.
There are none even remotely as ours in place or in the hearts of other men.
The American Revolution was the world's last hope,when we finally collapse from within, there will be no shortages of those
that will feel that they could have "done" something to save their nation,only then...it will be too late.
2007-09-30 08:57:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Secret Squirrel 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What needs to be done isn't so much start over again, in terms of the foundational beliefs of the country. Instead, the US people need to start over in their own beliefs. As long as people try to live a life wanting to get something for nothing - whether from the government, from lottery sources, or whatever, want to elect men and women to represent them and then never pay attention to what those people are doing and never tell their representatives what opinions they want represented, and most of all don't want to learn the issues and fight for the right against those who put their own self-interest over the rights of the country, then anything they would attempt to put in place would fail.
The rich are not the problem in this country.
The lazy, unmotivated, and greedy - either with or without money - are the problem. Hard working, motivated, and responsible rich are the ones who ensure that those _unable_ to do for themselves have their needs met.
2007-09-30 07:15:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Larry V 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
We need to vote vote vote. I cannot say that enough.
Your vote does count if you use it. If you feel strongly about an issue get people behind you and vote as a group. But what ever you do vote. When more people start 'talking' the government has to listen.
2007-09-30 07:11:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by blueink 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
It would only be the start of what is now.
2007-09-30 06:54:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by joe 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I say viva the revolution we need more say more say our government is bankrupting us they get all the benefits and perks . they do things behind our backs lie to us when will we wake up andsay no more!!!!!
2007-09-30 06:59:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋