we have a 5000 years of glorious / not so glorious past. But that was never india as a whole. Technicaly India was formed and beacame a republic only on 26 Jan 1950. prior to there were small, minor and some big kingdoms. Mughals were the rulers of most of such kingdom just prior to a few Britshers conquered MUghals Army. in 1947 the Mughals got back their kingdom ( technically). therefore we ought not to celebrate 15 aug 1947 as our day of independence. are you with me?
2007-09-29
23:09:30
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
some of you tend to disagree as i have posed questions not of your liking rather manuwadi learning you have obtained. secondly you have read of books on history written by your colonial cousins one of whom has named your Ram Setu as Adam's Bridge and you don not naturally agree. You all ought to grow up and mature or do not comment for comments sake. celebration of a country's ( which you people claim to have 5000 years of glorious existence and million years old Ramsetu , supposed to be consrructed by Vanar sena ( may be ancestors of SHIV SENA/ RANVIR SENA) can not be expected to celebrate 60 years of indipendence.Read more , know more , grow up,mature and then make your opinion public. And i agree with the observation of Visham-- that we need to rewrite our constitution to be in fashion.
2007-09-30
15:29:16 ·
update #1