English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Isn't this proof that college faculties are biassed heavily toward judgemental liberalism?
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/333254_tedvd27.html

2007-09-29 23:00:55 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Memnoch - nice try. However there was actually a lot of evidence against OJ, and he lost the subsequent civil trial. Do you really think that the lacrosse players would loose a civil trial?

2007-09-29 23:15:18 · update #1

http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2006/10/checking-in-with-group-of-88.html

2007-09-29 23:51:40 · update #2

Ret_Roch_Cop - I like where you are going with that. Unfortunately, the shameful actions of the 88 probably won't hurt and may even help their careers. - They may be considered martyrs in the upside down world of liberal thinking.

2007-09-30 04:37:13 · update #3

Come on boys and girls. I often hear denials of how the media is liberally biased, and that college faculties are not biased either. Where are you deniers now?

2007-10-02 00:33:34 · update #4

6 answers

I'm sure that you realize what happens to people who transgress. They are forever marked. The record of their transgressions follow them where ever they may go. From the champion athlete who uses steroids and gets an asterisk next to their name in the record book to the politician who engages in abherrent behavior and has his/her name forever associated with the action, to the common criminal whose record will always reflect their crimes. In the case of the 88 Duke professors who exhibited such poor judgement, something equally distinguishing should be done. Have you ever seen a list of their names published? I know I haven't. Their names and information should be published and notated to indicate their incredible lack of judgement. Can we have academic asterisks?

2007-09-30 02:55:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Here is what I want you to think about. If the faculty of Duke had said lets do nothing and wait for the trial to end what would have happened to them if the players were found guilty? Same thing that is happening now. It should be a valuable lesson as to why we have a innocent until proven guilty system. Instead it is turned into a liberals are such horrible people and we should destroy them all.

Here is another question, did OJ kill his wife? You probably say yes but he was found innocent. Should we crucify the millions who stand against him also?

2007-09-30 06:08:34 · answer #2 · answered by Memnoch 4 · 1 2

Hopefully those academics "so called" will have learned their lessons.
The students falsely charged have been vindicated. They should not only be fully reinstated at Duke but should be given special "courtesies" by the university.
Of course they always have the option of law suits, but that is
their decision to make.
The academic world has embarrassed itself millions of times and continues to do so. The brain dead libs are so entrenched that the only time the universities will ever get it right is when Jesus comes.
I Cr 13;8a

2007-09-30 14:35:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0 1

It's proof that we live in a puritanical society. And the justice would be for each professor to spend a day in stocks on campus, to be humiliated publically in the good old puritan way.

2007-09-30 06:11:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

i think the only thing we can do is rub it in their faces and show what total ******* we can be when we assume anything. of course if it was a white stripper and the players black the faculty would have been on the side of the players.

2007-09-30 06:14:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Fire them all. There public response should have been to let the court decide guilt. but it was not, they wanted those kids burn at the stake with no evidence.

2007-09-30 09:05:47 · answer #6 · answered by Sean N 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers