Are WARS Bench Marks in History? Is peace a gap between two Wars?

Question

Civil Defence Qotes" If you want to live in peace learn about War"

Answer 1

Most wars are, at best, significant events in history, however, there are two notable exceptions in the last 300-400 years that were significant bench marks in history, The first being the War of Independence, in which the British colonies in present day United States emerged as country, developing into the most powerful nation in the world.
Then, we have World War One, which at the end, transformed Europe from being run by a monarchy system in countries such as Russia, Austria, and Germany, into democratic societies in western Europe, and the origin of communism in Russia.

Answer 2

Warfare often leads to new technology. Eventually this technology trickles into civilian life. A perfect example is the internet itself. It was originally developed as a communication system for the US military, eventually it broadened and became what it is today. But without that perceived need for the military it's unlikely that anyone would have spent the money to develop it.

As for wars being benchmarks, I'm not sure if that's the case. I think it's more that wars are events that can be described. You can pinpoint the start and finish of a war, most times. However, long periods of peace just don't have any real descriptive.

The quote about knowing about war if you want peace is more in reference to being prepared. If you are prepared to defend yourself, you are less likely to actually have to. Since your enemies will not be eager to attack you if they think you're ready for them.

Answer 3

Yes, I would say wars are bench marks in History.
Yes, peace is a gap in between two wars.
I have been living in peace, and studying war, for most of my life. Despite it being a bench mark, despite the quotes from the Civil Defence, Military History is only taught in military academies and a few select universities. Despite its relevance, we let society dictate to us that it is the opposite.

Answer 4

No...wars are not benchmarks in history. They are just one of several "milestones" or "snapshots" within the context of history that allows you to gain better understanding and insights into a by-gone era.

A true and valid benchmark in history would have to also include many other parameters such as government, politics, science, arts, religion, education, climate, etc.

Wars stand out in historical analysis because they are without challenge the most documented and reported incident recorded by the people of the time. Famine and disease have killed more people in history than wars but you will not find as much fact-based information on those elements of history.

War is the short brief period that interrupts peace.

To benchmark a point in history you need to include many aspects of the time, not just one, if you want to be a true historian.

Answer 5

Wars are faught for peace. Peace is buying time for war.