I think Locker is better.
2007-09-29 19:17:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Locker mos def for now.
But I think Clausen will have a better college career.
2007-09-29 19:25:01 · answer #1 · answered by .80LikES2sUrF&lIsTEn2tEKnomUSic. 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Possibly Locker, he's more mobile, and he's learning. But tonight he twice crossed the line of scrimmage and then threw the ball, something I rarely see happen in any game, much less twice in one game. He also missed almost all of his long passes, overthrowing recievers that were in a position to make big plays, so his accuracy at anything other than short and medium-rang passes is in question.
On the other hand, if Clausen had a running game and an ofensive line, he might be dangerous. He's not as physical as Locker, but right now, he seems to be the better pure passer. I guess I'd say that Locker has more potential considering his ability to move and make things happen. If Locker learns, which I'm sure he will and becomes a better long-range passer, which I'm sure he will, he'll be the better QB in the future.
2007-09-30 02:24:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its not rocket science that Locker is playing better...but its also not rocket science that Washington has more talent around Locker than ND has around Clausen...In other words, Clausen is not the reason ND sucks right now...Its the O Line and the Defense...
2007-09-30 04:41:00 · answer #3 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is really no question. Locker is better.
I guess the only question would be, "what if we put Locker behind ND's line and put Clausen behind the UW's line".
Well, I can't answer that, as I am not a psychic, but I would bet my hard earned money that Locker would perform best in both environments..
2007-09-30 02:27:33 · answer #4 · answered by Robert C 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would have to say Locker
2007-09-30 02:21:16 · answer #5 · answered by jeremy t 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋