English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Some seemed to fall for his speech hook, line, and sinker. However, you forgot to read between the lines. When he said "there are no homosexuals in Iran" he really meant "there are not LIVE homosexuals in Iran."

Liberals seem pretty gullible these days. They walk around donning their tin foil hats and pointing blame at the government for anything from orchestrating 911 to creating category 5 hurricanes to ethnically cleanse New Orleans, most often based on a video they saw on You Tube made by bored college kids. ("Well, they said it on You Tube AND CNN so it MUST be TRUE!!"). Let us also not forget violent protests on nearly every college campus and downtown street of any major city.

United we stand, divided we fall. A civil war or broken government will make us unable to wage war against any other until it's resolved.

Knowing this, do you think his speech served no other purpose than to coerce the bleeding hearts to uprise against the government if we attack Iran?

2007-09-29 17:36:44 · 23 answers · asked by Karma 4 in Politics & Government Politics

23 answers

Rise up against the government...hmmmm...I can see that now, a scantily clad hoard dressed in an intimidating uniform of fashionable sadomasochistic leather apparel raining national collapse with a deadly barrage with the latest high tech cat of nine tails, proudly waving their rainbow flags...ooooh, shivers down my spine at the thought.
He probably kept it to a dull roar to make sure his a*s made it out of NYC in one piece.

2007-09-29 17:50:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Wow! far out. i had to get a dictionary for Uncle Ben's remarks? outstanding politician sir. Thank you,

Folks I'm a simple ordinary guy, now if you've ever been on a jury, you know how attorneys like some taxi drives just take you around the same block 29 times, to disorient you. So i decided hell with expert analysis, or some paranoid and suspicious idea! it is not logical. If You follow your simple straight line the truth will come to you, fast. The way i saw this story was that , i believe Man, answered all your questions, you had for some times now, that he did? of course only if you were listening open minded. But folks the man was not on trial here, he came to you remember, the man who was accused of almost every crime in the book. and then people had fun saying he had to use the booster in the restaurant?lmao, it's funny i admit. But Just trow him a bone as well.

Best Regards.

Folks, if US attacks Iran a revolution will take place, time frame well couple of hours?! All Can say is what John Wayne god bless his soul said once:
" That would be the Day". lol

My Friend Think 1st: I agree with you on attacking Iran, not logical. But the veterans of Iran-Iraq War all are tired men like me. But Iran is one of the youngest , if not the youngest, countries of the world. Half of the 70 Mil, are under.... let see 1979... under 28 years old.

Regards.

Hamid JAAN: I .m talking about the age of popualaion, u c Iran Pop.in 1979 was around 35 mil. and now is 70 MIL So do the math baba jaan.
As the rest i agree with you 100%
Go see my answers and read about king cyrus the graet
(kourosh kabir)
One Thumb up for you.

Regards.

2007-09-29 18:15:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 1 1

What are you saying "Iceman" ??
Really you are thinking that Iran is a young country?!
Its better to see Iran`s page and Persian Empire on Wikipedia website. This country was named Iran near 2000 BCE

If Americas come, this will not our first war with them! I proffer you to read more about Iran and Longest Conventional War of the 20th Century (September 1980 to August 1988). Don`t forget U.S backing of Iraq, on that war. In all, Iraq received $35 billion in loans from the West and between $30 and $40 billion from the Gulf States during the 1980s. But Iran still alive!

During the war, it purchased billions of dollars worth of advanced equipment from the Soviet Union, France, as well as from the People's Republic of China, Brazil, Egypt, Germany, and other sources (including Europe and facilities for making and/or enhancing chemical weapons). Germany along with other Western countries (among them United Kingdom, France, Spain (Explosivos Alaveses), Canada, Italy and the United States) provided Iraq with biological and chemical weapons technology and the precursors to nuclear capabilities.

2007-09-30 19:33:54 · answer #3 · answered by hamid_2fun 2 · 1 0

He tried, but he is so pathetic he'd make a prune
laugh! Americans protest just to have something
to do, but when it's down to the nitty-gritty...America
is very strong....did you try to find an American Flag
immediately after the attack of September 11, 2001?
Kinda hard to find in stores because they were all
on people's vehicles and porch posts! We were
Americans for America...and if need be, we will UNITE
Again and Again to meet the challenge...so these
clowns such as Ahmadinejad can 'sugarcoat' all they
want...the real 'SWEET' IS IN THE SPIRIT OF THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE !!!!!!!!

2007-10-07 01:09:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No matter what is the questions or the answers and no matter what we think we are or what we thinks about who we are ,meaning either prisoner or the warden , rich or poor, you eat meat or beans you love or you hate you except or reject ,leftist or rightist , black or white ,religious or atheist, and all other species living with us on planet earth and beyond which we all share a common bond that's we are really one ,but there is a down side to our existence a hidden secret which kept from us and they continue to suppress the truth and to protect their system of deception from crumbling , and humanity will be free ,but are you really wants to know ,are you ready , I hope so ,and I hope SO called man in authority read it and TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE GAME IS AGAINST ALL OF US , HERE COMES THE TRUTH MY FRIENDS THAT WE ALL LIVING ON THIS PLANET AS A GUINEA PIGS , LIKE REALLY ANIMAL FARM FOR EXPERIMENTS. PURE AND SIMPLE LABORATORY

2007-10-03 23:58:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think anyone would need to sugar coat what they say...
Even AhmadiNejad!
bcz already the number of ppl against the government has increased due to the Iraq war...

So speech or no speech... another war would result in a bigger number of ppl going against the government!

So don't blame ur problems on others!

2007-09-29 19:08:07 · answer #6 · answered by Samantha 6 · 2 1

Homosexual means aids ---> Aids me death

Christians and Muslims and Jews have been instructed in their religious texts against gay people. It is wrong and although god should be the only one to take life, I support Christians, Muslims and Jews stance on gays. They are a plague to society, who bring about aids and deaths.

You American's pretend to be gods people and Christians, yet do not follow by his words and choose to perceive the bible or any other religious text the way you want perceive it.

By all means feel free to live in an aid infected country. Although the Iranian government should kill them, he is right to take a stance against them and try to change them.

GOD CREATED ADAM AND EVE NOT ADAM AND STEVE.

2007-10-06 20:14:38 · answer #7 · answered by ArabianFalcon 2 · 0 0

No, he is more impotent and irrelevant than OBL. He will be gone after the next Democratic Presidential Elections in Iraq.

The idea of attacking Iran is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
The adults are all veterans of the Iraq War, battle ready and willing to sacrifice themselves.

Unlike you!

2007-09-29 17:45:42 · answer #8 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 1 2

The only people carrying on about this are conservatives,so no,it's not gonna happen.

Just like Billo's "War on Christmas",an "uprise" against the government is not going to happen,no matter what Michelle Malkin drones on about.

BTW-I've seen plenty of wingers carry on about stuff they've seen on YouTube and Fox,so you're making another senseless "point".

2007-09-29 17:43:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Is that what you really think?

Maybe instead of attacking "liberals" try actually talking to someone who is "liberal" you may find that you have more in common than you think.

Why don't you be a Uniter instead of a divider.

And for the record, Ahmadinejad is obviously a publicity hound and his speech only served the purpose of boosting his own ego.

2007-09-29 17:43:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers