Even if politics do not tickle your fancy, it is getting interesting. in 2007, five republican high rollers were exposed or alledgely exposed. We know who is behind the scandals, do we not? Therefore, retaliation is in order and imminent.
Here is my take on things to come as time unfolds: I believe the republicans have some really juicy infomation on Hillary but is smart enough to wait until 2008. The Republicans have money to burn and friends in high places; they will get their dirt.
They have a VERY easy target, the Clintons. This family reeks with scandals and controversies. When Hillary least expects and while she is smiling on podiums throughout this country, the air will be taken out of her sail.
They are the Jezebel and Ahab of politics. They were corrupted in Arkansas, and they were equally corrupt in D.C. They were and are the Bonnie and Cylde of 2007. Get ready, you first heard this on YA!!!!!!!!
2007-09-29 16:46:11 · 14 answers · asked by shawnLacey 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
All one has to do is put in the Clinton names plus scandal and corruption, and the reading will last for months. They have plenty to hide alright. It would be about time that them two are exposed and put in jail for the rest of their life, before they get a chance again to destroy the USA.
But don't say anything like that to the left! Because it is all made up. Because somehow they control the ability to go back in time and change it!
2007-09-29 17:17:38 · answer #1 · answered by lilly4 6 · 1⤊ 13⤋
Quite honestly there are enough scandals in the past that need re-visiting let along anything new that may or may not come up. For example, since Rudy was asked about his family in the last Republican debate, it made me wonder why I haven't heard anything about Hillary's family. Checking the Wiki revealed a campaign money scandal that her brother was involved in and other troubles relating to the Clinton's politics.
2007-09-29 23:58:25 · answer #2 · answered by School Is Great 3 · 10⤊ 0⤋
First of all, overusing exclamation marks unveils
a perception beyond - of lacking own substance ...
And Bingo. I heard this before, the variants have
been so extensively elaborated, also in the usual
twitter from braindead foxtv parrots. (just besides)
I just like love the mysterious-deaths conspiracy, too,
and now, only one further downing of creativity seems
to remain imaginable yet, goes approximately like this:
"HildaBeast got a covered tattoo on her backhead, it
was the number 665.7 and latestly it switched to 665.8 !!"
2007-09-30 01:08:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 13⤊ 1⤋
What more BS could you come up with? Republicans have been trashing them for almost 20 yrs. Give it a rest. There's nothing new and no one cares about it anymore.
2007-09-29 23:55:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 1⤋
I'd trust Hilary before I'd trust a guy who's been married three times and fakes a phone call from his current wife during a speech.
2007-09-30 00:23:30 · answer #5 · answered by Resident Heretic 7 · 11⤊ 1⤋
Obviously another Republican who didn't learn the lesson of the 90's.
If after Kenny Boy Starr blew 40 mil taxpayer $ digging up dirt on Hillary you still couldn't keep her from winning elections; You NEVER will...
2007-09-30 00:07:36 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
The Clintons have been in the media spotlight for 16 years. There is nothing new to reveal about them.
2007-09-30 00:04:57 · answer #7 · answered by Duffman 5 · 8⤊ 2⤋
Let's see.
She's a closeted lesbian socialist who was part of a trailer park scam to rip off old people and wants to turn the country into some quasi euro rip off.
How much worse could it get?
2007-09-29 23:55:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 12⤊ 2⤋
Just wait until you get a load of what comes out about your boy, Guiliani. What's going to come out about Hillary you think? The possibility that she may have experimented sexually? Ooh shivers!!!
2007-09-29 23:50:20 · answer #9 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 17⤊ 3⤋
Yes, she will be President.
Is that dark enough for you?
2007-09-30 01:03:05 · answer #10 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋