Will you change your brainwashed minds after reading these articles?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20070927/METRO/109270054/1004
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57605
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36049
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57895
Yes, my sources are right wing.
But do you really think I'm going to use a liberal truth hiding source?
That's what makes right wing sources so great. The reveal the truth that most liberals love to dodge.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
2007-09-29
14:18:38
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
When liberals resort to name calling and slanders, that means they're cornered and they know we're on to them.
They don't like facing the truth.
God help them
2007-09-29
14:27:11 ·
update #1
I really feel they are convinced that mighty man has altered this entire planets atmosphere and there is little anyone can do to change their minds...........
2007-09-29 14:23:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
I tried to read one of the articles and got bored.
I really don't understand your point. The government should act when the extra benefit greater than the cost. The government currently spends trillions on all sorts of things in all sorts of different ways. Currently, I would advocated spending more on both. Global Warming, of course, is much more dangerous in the long run, but terrorism is more dangerous in the short run (unless you are some of the relatively few who are being affected now. For example, communities on the Atoll islands have had to been moved).
2007-09-29 14:41:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Liberals have done everything in their power to hang the War on Terrorism in Iraq around President Bush's neck. They don't want our military to succeed because they would rather have the opportunity to slander the Honorable Mr. Bush and expand their political power, then seek a decisive victory in Iraq. It is also in their interests to spread unproven theories about global warming. Not many people disagree that the earth's climate has been on the rise, but I am not one to believe that it is exclusively due to mankind. The earth has had climate cycles for much longer than there has been recorded statistics. At this point, I do not consider the Liberal claim to global warming as a forgone conclusion to the eminent doom of man. In fact, I do not consider that claim to be as anything more than a lunatic screaming "fire" in a crowded theater. That does not necessarily mean that there is no fire, but neither does it produce one.
2007-09-29 14:43:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by I carried Old Glory proudly 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
Since your sources are all right wing, they would tend to back-up your ideas, right? Since all you seem to read & listen to are right wing ideas; how is it possible for you to not be brainwashed yourself? I listen to different sources of information, take what I like from each & leave the rest for anyone else that wants it! Because you end each posting with God Bless America, do you think that you love America more than the rest of us? Some of the things you post make me wonder if you aren't just a bit too far to the right! Perhaps you need to take more of the middle ground with some of your thoughts. All Liberals are not stupid, as you seem to think, some have very good minds & use them; they are not in limbo, they live in the same America as you do. Perhaps they don't want to have the government spying on the Internet or they don't want to wear a chip so that their actions can be followed whenever the government want to know what they are doing. You seem to think that anything that the government does is fine. Well, I happen to disagree with you, a lot! As to what I care about the most, why can't I care about both, they are equally important.
2007-09-29 14:40:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by geegee 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
The Liberal elitists can no longer make money and tax terrorism...yet they are able to tax the hoax of international Warming...which we are able to not greater ward off than the ice age that killed the dinosuars...
2016-11-06 19:29:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In answer to your question I honestly believe that libs care more about "Global Warming" than terrorists.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-09-29 20:12:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
I didn't read your links. Unlike you I can form my opinion without being guided to them. Global warming is real. Osama Bin Laden and terrorist from Saudi Arabia attacked the US. We are fighting in Iraq. No one there has attacked the US on it's own land. Also I have the right to be brainwashed if I want. If I choose to be brain washed you have nothing to do with it. You can say your opinion if you like. After all this time you have not listened to your presidents speeches. We are not there to fight terror. We are there to fight Islamic Extremist. We are there to give the Iraqi people the same rights the American people used to have. I guess there's not enough freedom to go around. To give it someone else you have to take it from someone else.
Good Bless America!
2007-09-29 14:26:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nathan 3
·
2⤊
7⤋
there is no war on terror....like the war on drugs or poverty....it's all about Israel and oil....there certainly are bad guys out there and we can call them terrorists, and it's an important issue, but it's not an issue of the kind of magnitude that the neocons want you to think, otherwise our borders would be secure and our ports and chemical and power plants (incl. nuclear) would be secure....911 was an inside job to provide an excuse to go into Iraq. Compared to climate change and our part in it and the immanent consequences for humanity of it, terrorism is blip on the radar screen.
2007-09-29 14:33:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by amazed we've survived this l 4
·
1⤊
6⤋
Of course they do. They always address fake problems of their own creation. They learned it from FDR.
2007-09-29 21:57:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Keith 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
No....it is possible to care about more than one thing at once and give them equal importance and consideration.
2007-09-29 14:22:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by lxtricks 4
·
7⤊
1⤋