is a stronger EU desirable?

Question

2 negatives and 2 positives?

Answer 1

People that have to live with varied and diverse goals and views HAVE to become more democratic, HAVE to respect more freedoms, or they kill each other.

1) If Europe unites more, it will get more freedom oriented.
2) If Europe unites more, it will increase freedom of speech and improve communications, increasing the odds that they will have accurate information and make better choices.

1) If Europe unites more, there is always a chance they will not agree with the U.S. AND have the power to do something about it.
2) If Europe unites and does nothing about Islam for fear of offending, it could very well turn Islamic (as many South-East Asian countries have lost THEIR governments to Islamic leaders who get voted in and then dissolve the government in favor of Islamic law).

2 and 2

Answer 2

mckenziecalhoun wrote:

Europe will get freedom" Europe has freedom. Plus we have free speech. I get the impression mckenziecalhoun you never been outside the US!
Europe has no problem with the Middle East or Islam. We haven't invaded any Middle East country. The EU is not about military. Power. It about trading of goods and the movements of people. Each EU member has there own laws etc. Some members of the EU are neutral countries.

Answer 3

Please define "stronger". Military stronger? No thank you. Stronger regarding trade? Stronger regarding... what? And concerning mckenziecalhoun's answer. Europe is in my view a very "free" region. Seemed weired you writing about freedom in the way you did.

Answer 4

No, Conservatism would not purchase into eugenics. The ball is on your court docket to describe why you are able to think of they do. you prefer me to coach a destructive. that's very no longer undemanding to do. notwithstanding, there are suitable philosophies of Conservatism which could help to dissuade your theories. American Conservatism believes in equivalent threat, equivalent justice, individualism and charity. It holds in great reverence the form and that is ideals of constrained federal government and organic (man or woman) rights. man or woman rights are those inherent interior the individuals and don't need an exterior enabler (like government) to lead them to artwork. It additionally believes interior the means and ability of unfastened marketplace techniques to make everyones existence extra suited. Conservatism has no concern with organic inequity in existence, in basic terms as long as human beings at the instant are not blocked or impeded of their turning out to be above those inequities. The implied Constitutional mandate of the applicable place of government, being the risk-free practices of rights and liberties of that is electorate is the mechanism that help this. this would not assure happiness, notwithstanding it protects their pursuit of it. the guy's skills are what determines how far they'd go. for people who've situation, there is charity, even a hand-up from government to a undeniable volume, yet no longer a handout. Compassion isn't measured by ability of how many human beings would properly be taken care of by ability of government, yet by ability of how many do no longer must be taken care of by ability of government, trapped by ability of welfare. no longer something in those ideals help something of eugenics.

Answer 5

Only if it acts as a counter balance to the U.S. If the U.S. has control over the E.U... *shudders*