http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-us&brand=msnbc&tab=m5&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/&fg=&from=00&vid=990ce8ab-8c76-48a0-839f-daf3652347fb&playlist=videoByTag:mk:us:vs:0:tag:News_Editors%20Picks:ns:MSNVideo_Top_Cat:ps:10:sd:-1:ind:1:ff:8A
2007-09-29 13:27:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
USA will not feel shameful, because it is shameless!
2007-09-29 20:35:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course they do.
Despite the fact that the CIA does not use terrorist tactics, of course.
They don't share the same definition of "terrorist" that we do.
I didn't realize we had killed that many. I had thought that quite a few of those had been killed by terrorists and the outside insurgents sent by Iran. Perhaps the actual count by officials is wrong and you are right.
I see why your answers and questions are private.
You've chosen sides in this conflict. So have we.
When Islam accepts as part of it's future the values of "free speech", "freedom of religion", and "equality", we will cheer in our streets.
Quite a contrast to what makes Islam cheer in the streets, isn't it?
2007-09-29 13:44:46 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
One man's tea is another man's poison. I would call
America a terrorist too, if I were Iranian or Iraqi or a number of other nationalities that America has killed directly or indirectly.
2007-09-29 13:37:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Every culture and era has its definition of 'ethical' warfare, and anything outside this is considered dishonorable or 'terrorist' tactics. This definition is convenient when one side wants to try to claim the moral high ground. But, ultimately, war is when one group says to another, 'screw the rules, you need to die.' The guerrilla tactics of one group are the terrorist tactics of another.
Pillaging the countryside is a time-honored tactic in weakening an enemies' resolve and resources. Morally repugnant, but so is war in general.
2007-09-29 13:34:01 · answer #4 · answered by displacedwolf 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The CIA targets top terrorists for elimination which, if you belong to a terrorist state or don't think that the targets are terrorists would make them terrorists too. Makes sense to me. Should other countries follow suit? Only if they don't think Al-queda is a terrorist organization.
2007-09-29 13:31:11 · answer #5 · answered by davster 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes. Rest of world should kill 1000,000 Iraqi.
2007-09-29 13:32:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Killing terrorist is doing the world a favor and the US Army should be given a medal for their contribution.
2007-09-29 13:36:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
We have not killed a million people!!!!! Maybe Saddam killed that many of his own. Go live in Iran or get your facts straight. Good Grief Charlie brown.
2007-09-29 13:30:59 · answer #8 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The number keeps getting larger, you people have found a way to declare victory, just declare the entire population dead and its over!~!
2007-09-29 13:37:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We didn't kill 1000,000 Iraqis. Iraqis and Al Qaeda did.
2007-09-29 13:46:44 · answer #10 · answered by Locutus1of1 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Our country enjoys making enemies at the moment.
2007-09-29 13:30:41 · answer #11 · answered by I'm too sexy 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋