English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Imagine, the people that were so desperate to fight them over there (Iraq) should be chomping at the bit to fight them on their home turf. Agree?

2007-09-29 13:20:31 · 10 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

Now you're talking! since 15 of the 19 supposed terrorist were from Saudi Arabia, as is Bin Laden, and NONE are from Iraq...
But since bush is in business with the Saudi Royals AND the Bin Ladens, it would affect his bank book in a negative fashion so he just attacked Iraq to steal their oil and now his bank book makes all those lost lives and America's lost reputation all worth it!

2007-09-29 13:31:11 · answer #1 · answered by ReBelle 5 · 2 2

First a correction: al-Qaeda is (became) in simple terms involved in US troops being in Saudi Arabia. (Osama could no longer care much less approximately Somalia). Or interior the al-Qaeda language, they wished the infidels out of the holy places. the U. S. troops have been invited and stationed there in 1990 after Iraq invaded Kuwait. (the main substantial reason at the back of the invasion became that Kuwait became pumping a extra robust volume of oil than her share interior the Rumalia oil fields straddling the border between the two international places. Compounded by way of the actuality that Kuwait wished her subsidizing of Iraq for the period of the Iran-Iraq conflict, Iraq wished to superb the economic difficulty by way of invasion.) as quickly as the invasion got here approximately, Saudi Arabia with the biggest oil production interior the international felt threatened and asked help. no longer desirous to permit the potential of the suited oil producing international places interior the international to come back below a consumer-friendly rule, US formed a extensive-based coalition that despatched a armed forces tension of around 500 thousand troops to the area (predominantly in Saudi Arabia) and after a quick air and land marketing campaign got rid of Saddam's forces from Kuwait. Al-Qaeda interprets the presence human beings troops (nicely, non-muslim troops) in Saudi Arabia (with the holy cities of Mecca and Medina) as a sacrilege. The final US troops have been quietly withdrawn from Saudi Arabia for the period of the 1st term of George W. Bush...

2016-10-20 08:21:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Not right now, please. Seems like we have all we can handle at the moment with two wars going on at the same time. I don't really see how we could take that on at this time. Besides, the people who wanted this war are not the ones fighting it, we, the little guy, are doing the fighting & dieing for them. Don't give them any ideas, they already have their next country to attack in mind!

2007-09-29 13:30:19 · answer #3 · answered by geegee 6 · 1 1

I say go after Osama Bin Laden first. We can always get to Saudi Arabia. They buy the best protectors money can buy.

2007-09-29 14:11:38 · answer #4 · answered by Nathan 3 · 0 0

Yes.
9/11 probably would never have happened it the Clintons had done their job.

That's why Sandy Berger had to steal & destroy Classified Documents to protect Bill Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.

(Cool!!! one thing about, Chinese Guy, you can sure excite the Hate American Democrats. I LOVE IT. Good work.)

2007-09-29 13:27:58 · answer #5 · answered by wolf 6 · 2 3

I agree. It is all about the oil there. We have a Base there and our soldiers are there to protect the Borders and they are not allowed to be around the people of Saudi.Un washed Rag heads.

2007-09-29 13:25:52 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 4 1

I agree we should send the " sultan"
a major bunker busting message

2007-09-29 13:37:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Careful Chi Guy. You are so close to the truth that you have now been logged by the NSA as an operative.

No kidding and welcome to the club.

2007-09-29 13:24:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Sadly, it's a little late............

2007-09-29 13:27:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

ya, no kidding!!!

2007-09-29 13:25:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers