2007-09-29 11:16:48 · 19 answers · asked by Dream Realized 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes but I guess there is no end game
2007-09-29 11:31:00 · answer #1 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
There is no end to this thing in Iraq, the politicians are already stating that it will go on for at least another 10 years.
The War on Terrorism is just another War on Drugs and how has that worked out?
By labeling this a War on Terrorism they can effectively make believe that terrorism is everywhere, anyone, and any country so they can effectively continue this war on terrorism till the end of time which might be pretty soon if they keep this up.
So therefore, it is up to the people to recognize this and stand up for their rights before it is too late.
They have already successfully been taking our freedoms away (funny thing is I thought the soldiers were fighting for our freedoms). I think they are in the wrong country, if that is true.
The Patriot Act and the unwarranted wiretapping are signs of the loss of freedom. There is so much more in the works.
2007-09-29 11:39:56 · answer #2 · answered by Twilight 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Let's see, the US is humiliated and withdraws the last of its troops from Iraq, which is still unstable, while Halliburton and Blackwater collect tens of billions of dollars from the quagmire, and we have nothing but a ballooning $20 trillion national debt and a junk rating on government bonds to show for it.
2007-09-29 12:15:46 · answer #3 · answered by dumboe8899 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
My opinion - a healthy business environment for globalist corporations in Iraq (and Iran).
If Islamic terrorism mattered to the Bush Administration, we would be confronting the source of the problem - Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia.
.
2007-09-29 11:23:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
It should be pretty obvious by now.
President of Iran ...Shi'ite
al-maliki,Prime Minister of Iraq's new government...Shi'ite
Muqtada al-sadr...Shi'ite and supported al-maliki.
Bush pressuring Iraq's new government to draft and pass the new "divvy up the oil" law, more than he is pressuring them to stand up and fight for their own freedom.
if you don't understand, the end game is to get them to pass the bill before leaving them in the hands of Iranian loyalists.
We get the oil, Iran gets the sand, and Bush claims victory.
2007-09-29 13:08:23 · answer #5 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. The purpose keeps changing and the goals keep changing. I don't want vague objectives, but concrete ones. After all the vague objective to fight the war on terror makes no sense as terror can emanate from any nation-state at any time.
2007-09-29 11:19:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
Yes but it's like the War on drugs. there is no end! It's for profits for the politicians and their buddies!
2007-09-29 11:57:22 · answer #7 · answered by MarkyMarkC 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.
Why do you want to know????
Are you making money off the war, somehow?
Are you gathering information for someone?
("Twilight" above, is irritated because like most Democrats, she doesn't want to be Wiretapped whenever she talks to a Terrorist on the phone.)
Twilight, honey, just write the Terrorists letters. They will be private between you all.
Cool!!!!!!!
2007-09-29 11:48:13 · answer #8 · answered by wolf 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
When the Muslims convert to Christianity.
2007-09-29 19:08:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Something brilliant..Like."Cain't we all just git along",,something along those lines.(yeah! right )...Go Bush,you're a real doozey.!..tic-toc..tic-toc...the clocks ticking,it won't be long til we get a "NEW DECIDER"....THATS... the end game for Iraq
2007-09-29 11:25:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋