English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Okay.. heres the issue at hand this afternoon!...

My last period was June 15th
I had sex with John* on July 1st
I had sex with Jim* on July 12th

I'm pregnant now.. the baby measures smaller than it should be.. is there ANY possibility it's Jims* and not Johns*

My pregnancy test came back positive on July 17th or so..

2007-09-29 10:42:32 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

35 answers

You would be very very very unlikely to get a positive pregnancy test on the 17th from having sex on the 12th so I would say it is John's. You are also more fertile around the time you had sex with John... although I would use the pregnancy test timing more that your fertile period as women can get pregnant at any time in their cycle.

2007-09-29 11:01:27 · answer #1 · answered by ஜBECஜ ~Mama to Lucy & bump~ 6 · 0 1

Find out via ultrasound exactly how far along you are. Then you can calculate when you conceived down to a week or less. Your doctor can help you with this.

Honestly, I don't think it would be possible for you to get a positive pregnancy test that early if it were Jim's. Say you ovulated and got pregnant on July 12 (Jim), it would take approx 2 weeks for your Hcg levels to be high enough for a home pregnancy test to detect it. 10 days at the earliest. Looking like John's going to be a daddy.

2007-09-29 10:54:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The baby is John's. If it were Jim's, you wouldn't have gotten a positive on the 17th. There is NO WAY it is Jim's.

I'm 100% positive about this. The fertilized egg would not have implanted by 5 days after sex and so there wouldn't be hcg in your system to give you a positive pregnancy test. The soonest you can get a positive is about 10 days after conception. I'm sorry.

2007-09-29 11:00:52 · answer #3 · answered by Mrs.P 6 · 0 1

its johns.. you had sex with john on day 17 (app) which is the when you can get pregnant you had sex with jim day 28 either on the day u were suppose to start or a couple day before either way that would of been too late,
u had sex with john during ovulation so it looks like johns most likely if the dates are all correct
u r pregnant try not to worry too much wate to the babys born to get dna test later.

2007-09-29 11:53:12 · answer #4 · answered by laylajai74 5 · 1 0

Sorry if you wanted it to be Jim's, but I am like 99.99%positive it is John's. You ovulate about 14 days after the first day of your period, That means around the time you were with John. Plus, if it was Jim's, the test wouldn't have been positive so soon.

2007-09-29 10:55:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It would be the 1st guys. Your pg test came back positive on the 17th. You had sex with the 2nd guy on the 12th that is only 5 days later. There is no way it is the 2nd guys baby. If your period is every 28 days then you would have been fertile around the time you slept with the 1st guy. UNLESS you have had sex with both of them frequently then im sorry then you will need a DNA test.

2007-09-29 11:09:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Man, this is TOUGH. I'm really sorry.

Actually, it could be either. The way they measure a baby and the sizes they go by aren't set in stone. I had sex on April 10, which would make my Due date Jan 5. My baby measures at a due date of Jan. 12 which would mean I had sex on the 22 of April. I had sex once, and I know it was on the 10th of April, therefor, I know what the doctor says isn't always completely accurate.

2007-09-29 12:20:09 · answer #7 · answered by babymama. 3 · 1 0

I guess there's always a possibility, but it would have probably been too early to show up on a test if it was Jim's. You can try to ask your doctor the estimated date of conception. If that doesn't help, do a paternity test after the baby is born. Good Luck!

2007-09-29 10:48:26 · answer #8 · answered by Tisha 5 · 0 1

little ones could make a dating more suitable, yet that basically happens once you're coping with a dating that replaced into already good interior the 1st place. in case you and your boyfriend are having issues, they gained't merely bypass away on account which you're having his newborn. in case you opt for to maintain this toddler, you are going to have various issues and various new responsibilites. Your existence is by no skill going to be an identical lower back, and being a teenage mom is definitely one in all the main confusing jobs interior the worldwide. You and your boyfriend are the two going to could discover a thank you to artwork issues out for the sake of your newborn, or ruin up and conform to nevertheless boost it mutually. My suggestion could be to a minimum of attempt staying mutually until the toddler is born, and notice the place issues bypass from there. you will need each and every of the affection and assist you will get while you're dealing with all of this.

2016-10-10 00:56:53 · answer #9 · answered by eubank 4 · 0 0

I think it would be Johns. You would have been ovulating around that time. Also, when you get a measurement on ultrasound, it is only an estimate of the size of your baby. Could be that the child is just small for his "age".
The only way you will know for sure who your baby's father is, is by DNA testing. So it's wise not to go pointing the finger at this time. Good luck with everything and congradulations!

2007-09-29 10:53:07 · answer #10 · answered by ★ Nina ★ 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers