I actually think it might even be more difficult to play with your father as your coach. They can expect more of you, and can take the punishments for playing bad beyond the practice field. If your father is your coach, it just adds an entirely new dimension to the mental aspect of the game.
2007-09-29 09:34:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Elizabeth O 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he is the best QB then there is no reason not to have him in that position. There are other example of coaches with their sons playing for them both in HS and college so I see no ethical violations.
2007-09-29 09:28:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he shows the best promise at practice then why would there be a problem? I'm sure he gets yelled at for making mistakes just as much as anyone else on the team. Good game: Colorado vs Oklahoma
2007-09-29 08:46:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dirty Sanchez 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I asked a basketball coach if he broke recruiting rules in getting his son to come to his college to play point guard. He said, "Everyone one of them. I housed him for 18 years, fed him, slept with his mother, everything."
If the son can play, why not? The issue comes when he's not good enough.
2007-09-29 09:42:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by wdx2bb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not a big fan of a kid playing at the same school, but ethics wise, yeh, why not?
2007-09-29 08:45:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes of course. Absolutely not.
2007-09-29 08:47:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by So Cal Johnny 4
·
0⤊
0⤋